green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sessa
See United States v. Hiss, 185 F.2d 822 (2d Cir.1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 532 , 95 L.Ed. 683 (1951) (describing Hiss’s trial and Chambers’ role).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tafoya
N.M.R.Evid. 608(a), N.M.S.A. 1978; See United States v. Hiss, 8 F.Supp. 559 (S.D.N.Y.1950), aff’d, 185 F.2d 822 (2d Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 532 , 95 L.Ed. 683 (1951).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Grayson Diggs
See United States v. Hiss, 185 F.2d 822, 824 (2d Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 532 , 95 L.Ed. 683 (1951) (independent proof of facts inconsistent with the innocence of the accused); McWhorter v. United States, 193 F.2d 982 (5th Cir. 1952); United States v. Neff, 212 F.2d 297 (3d Cir. 1954); United States v. Thompson, 379 F.2d 625 (6th Cir. 1967); Arena v. United States, 226 F.2d 227, 236 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 954 , 76 S.Ct. 342 , 100 L.Ed. 830 (1956) (tends to establish the defendant’s guilt, and if such evidence together with the direct evidence is inco…
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Harold FREEDMAN, Appellant
See United States v. Hiss, 185 F.2d 822 (2 Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 532 , 95 L.Ed. 683 (1951). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hyman Abrams
See United States v. Hiss, 185 F.2d 822, 832 (2d Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 532 , 95 L.Ed. 683 (1951).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcello Vivero and Ceferino Gordon
See United States v. Hiss, 185 F.2d 822, 832 (2 Cir.1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 532 , 95 L.Ed. 683 (1951).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Cioffi
See United States v. Hiss, 2 Cir., 185 F.2d 822, 831, 832 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 532 , 95 L.Ed. 683 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ben Gold v. United States
See United States v. Hiss, 2 Cir., 1950, 185 F.2d 822 , certiorari denied, 1951, 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 532 , 95 L.Ed. 683 . 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Suna Associates, Inc.
To the contrary, it is well-settled that "[a] district court has wide discretion in determining whether to permit evidence on rebuttal." United States v. Tejada, 956 F.2d 1256, 1266 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 841 , 113 S.Ct. 124 , 121 L.Ed.2d 80 (1992); see also United States v. Hiss, 185 F.2d 822, 832 (2d Cir.1950) (Whether certain testimony should have been received in rebuttal is a "matter[ ] so clearly within the discretion of the judge ... that we think no more need be said.... [W]hat is within the scope of permissible contradiction is largely a matter of avoiding confusion of issu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaplow v. State
See also, United States v. Hiss, 185 F.2d 822 (2d Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 532 , 95 L.Ed. 683 ; and United States v. Five Cases, 179 F.2d 519 (2d Cir. 1950), cert. denied, 339 U.S. 963 , 70 S.Ct. 997 , 94 L.Ed. 1372 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chairman of United States Maritime Commission v. California Eastern Line, Inc.
Compare Land v. Dollar, 1951, 88 U.S. App.D.C. 162, ] 88 F.2d 629 , certiorari denied 1951, 340 U.S. 948 , 71 S.Ct. 530 , 95 L.Ed. 684 ; Land v. Dollar, 1951, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 190 F.2d 366 ; Land v. Dollar, 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 88 , 190 F.2d 623 ; Id., 1952, 344 U.S. 800 , 73 S.Ct. 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hiss
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 520.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 12, 1951.
Robert M. Benjamin, Harold Rosenwald and Chester T. Lane for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
Application, Consideration, Frankfurter, Reed, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Me. Justice Reed, Mb. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.