A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi v. Isbrandtsen Co., 342 U.S. 950 (1952). · Go Syfert
Search
A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi v. Isbrandtsen Co., 342 U.S. 950 (1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bonavitacola v. United States (paed, 1955-11-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Bonavitacola v. United States
E.D. Pa. · 1955 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Chiarelli, 7 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 528 , certiorari denied 342 U.S. 913 , 72 S.Ct. 359 , 96 L.Ed. 683 , rehearing denied 342 U.S. 950 , 72 S.Ct. 551 , 96 L.Ed. 706 ; Ng Sing v. United States, 9 Cir., 1926, 8 F.2d 919 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Green
Mass. App. Ct. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Chiarelli, 192 F.2d 528, 532 (7th Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 913 , reh. denied, 342 U.S. 950 (1952) (heroin is a derivative of opium); Jordan v. United States, 345 F.2d 302, 304 (10th Cir. 1965) (heroin derivative of opium and hence a narcotic); United States v. Gould, 536 F.2d 216, 218-219 (8th Cir. 1976) (cocaine hydrochloride is a derivative of coca leaves). 9 Contra White v. State, 161 Ind. App. 568, 572-575 (1974) (refusal to take judicial notice that methadone is a narcotic drug).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gaiten v. Stahl
W.D.N.C. · 1971 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Hallinan v. United States, 182 F.2d 880 (9th Cir., 1950), cert. denied. 341 U.S. 952 , 71 S.Ct. 1010 , 95 L.Ed. 1375 , rehearing denied 342 U.S. 956 , 72 S.Ct. 623 , 96 L.Ed. 710 , rehearing denied 343 U.S. 931 , 72 S.Ct. 756 , 96 L.Ed. 1341 (1952).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
A/S J. Ludwig Mowinckels Rederi
v.
Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. and Federal Maritime Board v. United States
No. 134; No. 135.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 10, 1952.
342 U.S. 950
Roscoe H. Hupper argued the cause for appellants in No. 134. With him on the brief was Burton H. White. Arthur M. Boat argued the cause for appellant in No-135. With him on the brief were Francis S. Walker and George F. Galland. J. Roger Wollenberg argued the cause for the United States and the Secretary of Agriculture, appellees., With him on the brief were, Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, W. Carroll Hunter and Neil .Brooks. William L. McGovern argued the cause for the Isbrandtsen Co., Inc., appellee. With him on the brief was John J. O’Connor.
Cases, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 24 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed' by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.