green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.0 score
“whatever control courts have exerted over tenure or compensation under an appointment, they have never assumed by any process to control the appointing power either in civilian or military positions.”
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Osborn v. United States
whatever control courts have exerted over tenure or compensation under an appointment, they have never assumed by any process to control the appointing power either in civilian or military positions.
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy v. United States
See Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 94 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953); see also Fisher v. United States, 402 F.3d at 1177 ; Sargisson v. United States, 913 F.2d 918, 921-22 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Berkley v. United States
See Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93-94 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bond v. United States
See Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93-94 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953), reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953); Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 779-80 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 941 , 109 S.Ct. 365 , 102 L.Ed.2d 355 (1988); Gilchrist v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 791, 799 (1995); Rice v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 156, 165-66 (1994), aff'd, 48 F.3d 1236 (Fed.Cir.1995) (table); Sebra v. Neville, 801 F.2d 1135, 1141 (9th Cir. 1986); Wilson v. Walker, 777 F.2d 427, 429 (8th Cir.1985); Schlanger v. United States, 586 F.2d 667, 671-72 (9th Cir.1…
cited
Cited "see"
Samuel F. Vesser, Jr. v. Office of Personnel Management
See Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference, 345 U.S. 128 , 73 S.Ct. 570 , 97 L.Ed. 872 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 778 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sargisson v. United States
See Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93-94 , 73 S.Ct. 534, 539-40 , 97 L.Ed. 842 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953); Brenner v. United States, 202 Ct.Cl. 678, 686 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831 , 95 S.Ct. 54 , 42 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerome Jablon, M.D. v. United States
(2×)
See 10 U.S.C. § 672 (d) and Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 , reh. denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953).
cited
Cited "see"
Piland v. Eidson
See Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953), rehearing denied 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953).
cited
Cited "see"
Piland v. Eidson
See Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953), rehearing denied 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whiting v. Real Estate Commission
See United States v. Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22 , 73 S.Ct. 510 , 97 L.Ed. 754 , re-bearing denied 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 778 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953); Lewis v. United States, 348 U.S. 419 , 75 S.Ct. 415 , 99 L.Ed. 475 , rehearing denied 349 U.S. 917 , 75 S.Ct. 602 , 99 L.Ed. 1250 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. United States
Dysart v. United States, 369 F.3d at 1317 (other citations omitted); see also Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 92 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741 , 609 F.2d 980, 983 (1979); Cooper v. United States, 203 Ct.Cl. 300, 303 (1973); and D’Arco v. United States, 194 Ct.Cl. 811 , 441 F.2d 1173, 1175 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chesna v. United States Department of Defense
See also Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 91 , 73 S.Ct. 534, 539 , 97 L.Ed. 842 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 , 73 S.Ct. 779 , 97 L.Ed. 1360 (1953); Gayer v. Schlesinger, 490 F.2d 740, 754 (D.C.Cir. 1973), amended 494 F.2d 1135 (D.C.Cir.1974): The Fifth Amendment privilege protects a person who invokes it from self-accusation; but when he seeks a license at the hands of an agency acting under the standard of public interest, and information substantially relevant to that standard is withheld under the privilege, as may be done, the need for information and the cooperation of the applicant w…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cofield v. Nuckles
(2×)
See Stancil v. United States, 200 F.Supp. 36, 43 (E.D.Va. 1961); see also Tuggle v. Commonwealth, 230 Va. 99 , 111 n.5, 334 S.E.2d 838 , 846 n.5 (1985) (citing Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 87 , reh’g denied, 345 U.S. 931 (1953)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tate
v.
California
v.
California
No. 252.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 6, 1953.
345 U.S. 931
Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
344 U. S. 910. Second petition for rehearing denied.