Nw. Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. v. Kendall, 347 U.S. 960 (1954). · Go Syfert
Search
Nw. Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. v. Kendall, 347 U.S. 960 (1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “The exclusion of witnesses from the courtroom is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the trial court and the exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed except in case of clear abuse.”
127 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edmund Edinborough (ca3, 1980-06-09) · Strongest negative: United States v. Williams (nysd, 1971-12-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Williams (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1971 · signal: but see · confidence high
United States v. Mullings, su pra; but see In re Albert Lindley Lee Memorial Hospital, 209 F.2d 122 (2d Cir. 1953) (dictum), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 960 , 74 S.Ct. 709 , 98 L.Ed. 1104 (1954).
discussed Cited "but see" John J. & Warren H. Graham v. Triangle Publications, Inc. (2×)
E.D. Pa. · 1964 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Consolidated Gas Electric Light & Power Co. of Baltimore, 209 F.2d 131 (4th Cir. 1953), cert. den., 347 U.S. 960 , 74 S.Ct. 709 , 98 L.Ed. 1104 (1954).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edmund Edinborough
3rd Cir. · 1980 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the exclusion of witnesses from the courtroom is a matter resting in the sound discretion of the trial court and the exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed except in case of clear abuse.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Texas Heart Institute (2×)
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Albert Lindley Lee Memorial Hospital, 209 F.2d 122 (2d Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 960 , 74 S.Ct. 709 , 98 L.Ed. 1104 (1954).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Texas Heart Institute (2×)
5th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Albert Lindley Lee Memorial Hospital, 209 F.2d 122 (2d Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 960 , 74 S.Ct. 709 , 98 L.Ed. 1104 (1954).
examined Cited "see" Public Service Commission v. Hahn Transportation, Inc. (4×)
Md. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. v. Kendall, 210 F.2d 283 (U.S. Emergency Ct. of Appeals 1954), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 960 , 74 S.Ct. 709 , 98 L.Ed. 1104 (1954); United States v. Pope, 189 F. Supp. 12, 21 (S.D.N.Y. 1960); In re Peppers, 189 Cal. 682, 688 , 209 P. 896, 898 (1922).
discussed Cited "see" Goldlawr, Incorporated v. Shubert
E.D. Pa. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. v. Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., 209 F.2d 131 (4th Cir. 1953), cert. den. 247 [347] U.S. 360 [960, 74 S.Ct. 709 , 98 L.Ed. 1104 ] (1954); Crest Auto Supplies, Inc. v. Ero Manufacturing Co., 360 F.2d 896 (7th Cir. 1966).” (emphasis ours.) Some confusion appears to exist, however, since other courts have used the principles of the two defenses interchangeably.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.
v.
Kendall, Assistant Administrator, Economic Stabilization Agency
No. 631.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1954.
347 U.S. 960
De Witt Williams for petitioners., Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Samuel D. Slade and Morton Hollander for respondent.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)

United States Emergency Court of Appeals. Certiorari denied.