green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“substantial adverse interest", as used in applying the gift tax, "means a direct legal or equitable interest in the trust property”
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Estate of Maxant v. Commissioner
substantial adverse interest", as used in applying the gift tax, "means a direct legal or equitable interest in the trust property
discussed
Cited "see"
Outwin v. Commissioner
(2×)
Sec. 25.2511-2(c) and (e), Gift Tax Regs.; see Latta v. Commissioner, 212 F.2d 164 (3d Cir. 1954), cert. denied 348 U.S. 825 (1954); Camp v. Commissioner, 195 F.2d 999 (1st Cir. 1952); Commissioner v. Prouty, 115 F.2d 331 (1st Cir. 1940).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rudolph O. Schneider, Jr. And Steven Vitale v. United States
(2×)
See, Nilva v. United States, 212 F.2d 115 (8th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 825 , 75 S. Ct. 40 , 99 L.Ed. 650 (1954) (upholding 15 U.S.C. § 1171-77 , which prohibits the transportation of gambling devices into any state, but provides that a state may exempt itself from the act); Turf Center, Inc. v. United States, 325 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1963) (upholding 18 U.S.C. § 1952 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Hycon, Inc.
See Jonathan Woodner Co. v. Mather, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 234 , 210 F.2d 868 , cert. denied, 348 U.S. 824 , 75 S.Ct. 39 , 99 L.Ed. 650 (1954) (dicta); Restatement, Conflict of Laws § 401, comment b (1948 Supp.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moses-Ecco Company, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Corporation, Roscoe-Ajax Corporation v. Charles Detwiler
(2×)
See Jonathan Woodner Co. v. Mather, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 234 , 210 F.2d 868 , cert. denied, 348 U.S. 824 , 75 S.Ct. 39 , 99 L.Ed. 650 (1954); Smith v. John B.
cited
Cited "see"
The Gauley Mountain Coal Company (Williams River No. 1 Mine) v. Director of the United States Bureau of Mines
See Nilva v. United States, 8 Cir., 212 F.2d 115 , certiorari denied 348 U.S. 825 , 75 S.Ct. 40 , rehearing denied 348 U.S. 889 , 75 S.Ct. 203 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Robinson
App. 3d 794, 795-96 , 471 N.E.2d 625 ; see also United States v. Marcus (7th Cir. 1954), 213 F.2d 230, 232 , cert. denied (1954), 348 U.S. 824 , 99 L.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elmer Cummings
(4×)
See also Nilva v. United States, 212 F.2d 115, 121 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 825 , 75 S.Ct. 40 , 99 L.Ed. 650 (1954) (application of this principle in a case involving interstate transportation of gambling devices). 26 A careful review of the record has convinced us that, in light of this principle, the trial judge's conclusion that Cummings did know that he was transporting the slot machines in interstate commerce is supported by sufficient evidence.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Glover
v.
Officers and Minister of the Congregational Church of Hartford, known as the Center Church
v.
Officers and Minister of the Congregational Church of Hartford, known as the Center Church
No. 149.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1954.
Edward McFadden, Jr. for petitioners., Valentine J. Sacco for respondents.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: U.S. Tax Court (1)
Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut. Certiorari denied.