Hillcrea Exp. & Imp. Co. v. Universal Ins., 348 U.S. 834 (1954). · Go Syfert
Search
Hillcrea Exp. & Imp. Co. v. Universal Ins., 348 U.S. 834 (1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
67 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bowman v. United States (uscfc, 1996-04-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Bowman v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Aerolineas, 77 F.3d at 1571 (citing Clapp v. United States, 127 Ct.Cl. 505 , 117 F.Supp. 576, 581 (1954), cert. denied 348 U.S. 834 , 75 S.Ct. 55 , 99 L.Ed. 658 (1954) (declining to consider the wrongful exaction of money under the Shipping Act a tort)). .
discussed Cited "see" Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Vene-Embarques, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peninsular Fire Insurance Co. v. Wells, 438 So.2d 46, 53 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. dismissed, 443 So.2d 980 (1983); Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Flitman, 234 So.2d 390, 391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970); see generally Hillcrea Export & Import Co. v. Universal Insurance Co., 110 F.Supp. 204 , (S.D.N.Y.1953), aff'd, 212 F.2d 206 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 834 , 75 S.Ct. 57 , 99 L.Ed. 657 (1954) (question of whether or not loss is within terms of marine cargo insurance policy is one of fact).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Davis v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cir. 1996) (quoting Eastport S. S. Corp. v. United States, 372 F.2d 1002, 1007 (Ct. Cl. 1967)) (finding plaintiffs could maintain an illegal exaction suit under the Tucker Act when the government compelled airlines to shoulder costs which the government had a legal duty to bear); see also id. at 1573 (quoting Clapp v. United States, 117 F. Supp. 576, 580 (Ct. Cl. 1954)) (“[A]n illegal exaction has occurred when ‘the [g]overnment has the citizen’s money in its pocket.’”), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 834 . 20 May 2022 Op. & Order at 6 (emphasis added).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Davis v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cir. 1996) (quoting Eastport S. S. Corp. v. United States, 372 F.2d 1002, 1007 (Ct. Cl. 1967)) (finding plaintiffs could maintain an illegal exaction suit under the Tucker Act when the government compelled airlines to shoulder costs which the government had a legal duty to bear); see also id. at 1573 (quoting Clapp v. United States, 117 F. Supp. 576, 580 (Ct. Cl. 1954)) (“[A]n illegal exaction has occurred when ‘the [g]overnment has the citizen’s money in its pocket.’”), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 834 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1961 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Southeastern Oil Florida, Inc. v. United States, 119 F.Supp. 731 , 127 Ct. Cl. 409 , certiorari denied, 348 U.S. 834 , 75 S.Ct. 56 , 99 L.Ed. 658 ; A. H.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hillcrea Export & Import Co., Inc.
v.
Universal Insurance Co.
No. 242.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1954.
348 U.S. 834
Alfred B. Nathan for petitioners., Martin Detels and Vincent L. Leibell, Jr. for respondent.
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.