green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.9 score
“dutch boy”
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sun Banks of Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation Etc. v. Sun Federal Savings and Loan Association, a Federal Savings and Loan Association
(2×)
dutch boy
discussed
Cited "see"
Vinh-Sanh Trading Corporation v. SFTC, Inc.
See Sleekcraft, 599 F.2d at 349 26 (citing National Lead Co. v. Wolfe, 223 F.2d 195, 199 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 27 (1955)). 1 mark is translated into English to see whether, “to those American buyers familiar with the foreign 2 language, the word would have a descriptive connotation.” See McCarthy on Trademarks, § 11:34 3 (5th ed.); see also Bart Schwartz Int’l Textiles, Ltd. v. F.T.C., 129 U.S.P.Q. 258 , 289 F.2d 665 , 4 668 (1961) (“[A] descriptive word in a foreign language cannot be registered in the United States 5 as a trademark for the described product.”…
discussed
Cited "see"
Vinh-Sanh Trading Corporation v. SFTC, Inc.
See Sleekcraft, 599 F.2d at 349 (citing National Lead Co. v. Wolfe, 4 223 F.2d 195, 199 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 (1955)). 5 Trademarks consisting of non-English words must pass the “foreign equivalents” 6 test: the mark is translated into English to see whether, “to those American buyers familiar 7 with the foreign language, the word would have a descriptive connotation.” See McCarthy 8 on Trademarks, § 11:34 (5th Ed.); see also Bart Schwartz Intern.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cooke v. Griffiths-Garcia Corp.
See White v. Luber, 144 A.2d 774, 776 (1958) (summary judgment inappropriate “when such factors as motive, intent and conscience were ‘necessary instruments in obtaining truth’ ” (quoting Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 (1955))). *1258 The fact that Griffiths-Garcia maintains that it relied on the representations of the sellers’ attorney about the status of appellant’s contract with the sellers does not necessarily insulate it from liability because its reliance must be reasonable.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co.
See National Lead Co. v. Wolfe, 223 F.2d 195, 204 (9th Cir.1955), *742 cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 135 , 100 L.Ed. 778 (1955); Harold F. Ritchie Inc. v. Chesebrough Pond’s, Inc., 281 F.2d 755 (2d Cir.1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haberman v. Tobin
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 (1955), wherein the court stated “Of course, it is irrelevant that plaintiff owns but a few shares (except upon a demand for security under the New York statute . . .” Id. at 761 (footnote omitted). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Fincke v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753, 758-59 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 .” As shown above, there are genuine issues of material fact here which must be reserved for the fact finder and the Motion for Summary Judgment on the Counterclaim of Phoenix must be denied. 1 .
discussed
Cited "see"
National Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Altus Flying Service, Inc.
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753, 758-59 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 . 21 For these reasons we are convinced that the summary disposition prevented necessary examination of conflicting testimony and credibility in the crucible of a trial. 15 The case was clearly not one for summary judgment.
cited
Cited "see"
National Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Altus Flying Service, Inc.
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753, 758-59 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 .
cited
Cited "see"
Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook
See, for example, Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Pettit v. American Stock Exchange
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753, 766 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 (1955) (dissenting opinion of Frank, J.). 22 .
cited
Cited "see"
Wilner v. United States
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 2 Cir., 224 F.2d 753, 758-61 , certiorari denied, 1955, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 ; Colby v. Klune, 2 Cir., 1949, 178 F.2d 872, 873-74 . 28 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbot v. Frackman
See Subin v. Goldsmith, 2 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 753 , certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 ; Arnstein v. Porter, 2 Cir., 1946, 154 F.2d 464, 471 ; Doehler Metal Furniture Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 1945, 149 F.2d 130 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Loew's Theatres, Inc.
See, e.g., National Lead Co. v. Wolfe, 223 F.2d 195 , 105 USPQ 462 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 135 , 100 L.Ed. 778 , 107 USPQ 362 (1955) (DUTCH and DUTCH BOY for paint); Hyde Park Clothes, Inc. v. Hyde Park Fashions, Inc., 93 USPQ 250 (S.D.N.Y.1951), aff 'd, 204 F.2d 223 , 97 USPQ 246 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 827 , 74 S.Ct. 46 , 98 L.Ed. 351 , 99 USPQ 491 (1953) (HYDE PARK for men’s suits); La Touraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co., 157 F.2d 115 , 70 USPQ 429 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 329 U.S. 771 , 67 S.Ct. 189 , 91 L.Ed. 663 , 71 USPQ 328 (1946) (LA TOURAI…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Visa International Service Ass'n v. Visa Hotel Group, Inc.
See, e.g., National Lead Co. v. Wolfe, 223 F.2d 195, 199 (CA 9), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 135 , 100 L.Ed. 778 (1955) (Dutch Boy not used geographically or descriptively, but in a ‘fictitious, arbitrary and fanciful manner’).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an Individual
See, e. g., National Lead Co. v. Wolfe, 223 F.2d 195, 199 (CA 9), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 135 , 100 L.Ed. 778 (1955) (Dutch Boy not used geographically or descriptively, but in a “fictitious, arbitrary and fanciful manner”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.
Case Company v. Borak, supra (377 U.S. *103 p. 432, 84 S. Ct. p. 1560, 12 L.Ed.2d 423 ); see also, Subin v. Goldsmith, 224 F.2d 753 (2d Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 136 , 100 L.Ed. 779 (1955), and Loss, Private Actions Under the Proxy Rules, 73 Harv.L.R. 1041, 1062 (1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bardin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 355.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 1955.
Wesley G. Hall for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Holland and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.