Thompson v. Coastal Oil Co., 350 U.S. 956 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
Thompson v. Coastal Oil Co., 350 U.S. 956 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smith v. American Mail Line, Ltd. (wawd, 1973-07-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. American Mail Line, Ltd.
W.D. Wash. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Thompson v. Coastal Oil Co., 119 F.Supp. 838 (D.N.J.1954), rev’d on other grds. 221 F.2d 559 (3d Cir. 1955), aff’d. 350 U.S. 956 , 76 S.Ct. 345 , 100 L.Ed. 832 , reh. and reversal [reinstating judgment of the trial court] 352 U.S. 862 , 77 S.Ct. 90 , 1 L.Ed.2d 73 (1956); Kirsch v. United States, 450 F.2d 326 (9th Cir. 1971); Stechcon v. United States, 439 F.2d 792 (9th Cir. 1971); and Walters v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 309 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1962), reh. en banc den. 312 F.2d 893 . 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thompson
v.
Coastal Oil Co.
No. 105.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 30, 1956.
350 U.S. 956
Charles Andrews Ellis argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Silas Blake Axtell. Michael E. Hanrahan argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
Consideration, Took.
Published

Certiorari, 350 U. S.. 817, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Argued January 24, 1956. Decided January 30,1956.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.*

Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

This judgment vacated and case restored to docket for reargument, post, p. 985.