green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Carl McNeal v. Hi-Lo Powered Scaffolding, Inc., an Ohio Corporation
See Eastern Air Lines v. Union Trust Co., 221 F.2d 62, 72 (D.C.Cir.1955), rev'd on other grounds, 350 U.S. 962 , 76 S.Ct. 429 , 100 L.Ed. 835 (1956). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roger Aarons and Robert Swann
See Eastern Air Lines v. Union Trust Co., 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189 , 221 F.2d 62, 69 (1955) , rev’d on other grounds, 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 , order of reversal modified and case remanded, 350 U.S. 962 , 76 S.Ct. 429 , 100 L.Ed. 835 -(1956), ruling on this issue adhered to, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 239 F.2d 25, 28 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 942 , 77 S.Ct. 816 , 1 L.Ed.2d 760 (1957); United States v. Reid, 110 F.Supp. 253, 256-257 (D.Md.1955); 1 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 6.10, at 395-396 (1958); 68 Harv.L.Rev. 535, 536 (1955) (commenting on the Hotch decision).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cook v. United States
See also 1955, 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 , and 1956, 350 U.S. 962 , 76 S.Ct. 429 , 100 L.Ed. 835 , for action by the Supreme Court on a related case against Eastern Airlines, Inc. 14 For present purposes we must proceed on the assumption that the foregoing is the law of the case, though if suit had been brought in Virginia against a private employer of personnel in the control tower, I am sure that the Virginia courts would not have applied their own death act but would have applied the death act of the District of Columbia, where the fatal collision took place and in which t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cook v. United States
See also 1955, 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 , and 1956, 350 U.S. 962 , 76 S.Ct. 429 , 100 L.Ed. 835 , for action by the Supreme Court on a related case against Eastern Airlines, Inc. For present purposes we must proceed on the assumption that the foregoing is the law of the case, though if suit had been brought in Virginia against a private employer of personnel in the control tower, I am sure that the Virginia courts would not have applied their own death act but would have applied the death act of the District of Columbia, where the fatal collision took place and in which ther…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Railway Employes' Department, American Federation of Labor
v.
Hanson
v.
Hanson
No. 451.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1956.
Published
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Nebraska. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 350 U. S. 910.) The motions of the State of Utah and Chamber of Commerce of the United States for leave to appear and present oral argument, as amici curiae, are denied.