green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.0 score
“the charge of conspiracy in a civil action is merely the string whereby the plaintiff seeks to tie together those who, acting in concert, may be held responsible in damages for any overt act or acts.”
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pereira v. Binet (In Re Harvard Knitwear, Inc.)
the charge of conspiracy in a civil action is merely the string whereby the plaintiff seeks to tie together those who, acting in concert, may be held responsible in damages for any overt act or acts.
discussed
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corporation, as Receiver for Missouri Savings Association v. Home Savings of America
See Rutkin v. Reinfeld, 229 F.2d 248, 256 (2d Cir.) (absent express legislative intent, repeal of prohibition cannot validate illegal contract to manufacture and distribute liquor), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 50 , 1 L.Ed.2d 60 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dirk Mayberry
See Herzog v. United States, 235 F.2d 664, 666 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (noting that Rule 52(b) of the *722 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure grants appellate courts authority to notice error on their own motions), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 54 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956); see also, United States v. Rico, 895 F.2d 602, 603 (9th Cir.1990) (considering sua sponte whether special assessment against defendant was error).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Diggs, United States of America v. Peter Oliverez
Fed.R.Crim.P. 30, 52; see Herzog v. United States, 235 F.2d 664 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 54 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Leon Bearden v. United States
See Herzog v. United States, 9 Cir. 1956, 235 F.2d 664 , cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 54 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Askew v. Sgt. Millerd
See, e.g., Simpson v. Weeks, 570 F.2d at 243 (“The charge of conspiracy in a civil action is merely the string whereby the plaintiff seeks to tie together those who, acting in concert, may be held responsible for any overt act or acts.”) (emphasis added) (quoting Rutkin v. Reinfeld, 229 F.2d 248, 252 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 50 , 1 L.Ed.2d 60 (1956)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Askew v. Sgt. Keith Millerd
See, e.g., Simpson v. Weeks, 570 F.2d at 243 (" The charge of conspiracy in a civil action is merely the string whereby the plaintiff seeks to tie together those who, acting in concert, may be held responsible for any overt act or acts.") (emphasis added) (quoting Rutkin v. Reinfeld, 229 F.2d 248, 252 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 (1956)). 17 In sum, we hold that the district court did not err in granting defendants' motion for judgment as a matter of law on Askew's 1983 civil conspiracy claim because the "record contains no proof beyond speculation to support the verdict," Larson v. M…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Korn v. Merrill
See, e.g., Rutkin v. Reinfeld, 229 F.2d 248 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 50 , 1 L.Ed.2d 60 (1956) ; Saunders v. National Basketball Ass’n, 348 F.Supp. 649, 652-53 (N.D.Ill.1972) ; Lowell Wiper Supply Co. v. The Helen Shop, Inc., 235 F.Supp. 640, 644 (S.D.N.Y.1964) ; Skouras Theatres Corp. v. Radio-Keith-Orpheum Corp., 193 F.Supp. 401, 405-06 (S.D.N.Y.1961).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Virginia R. Hattaway v. United States
See also Herzog v. United States, 2 Cir. 1956, 235 F.2d 664, 666 , cert. den. 352 U.S. 844 , 77 S.Ct. 54 , 1 L.Ed.2d 59 (1956).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herzog
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 208.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1956.
Frederick Bernays Wiener and Spurgeon Avakian for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Oscar H. Davis, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Philip Elman for the United States.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion the petition should be granted.