Holophane Co. v. United States, 352 U.S. 903 (1956). · Go Syfert
Holophane Co. v. United States, 352 U.S. 903 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
211 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 48 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (scotus, 2023-06-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
SCOTUS · 2023 · confidence medium
Our cases had thus “consistently denied the constitutionality of measures which restrict the rights of citizens on account of race.” Id., at 11–12; see also Yick Wo, 118 U. S., at 373–375 (commercial property); Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U. S. 1 (1948) (housing covenants); Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U. S. 475 (1954) (composition of juries); Dawson, 350 U. S., at 877 (beaches and bathhouses); Holmes v. Atlanta, 350 U. S. 879 (1955) (per curiam) (golf courses); Browder, 352 U. S., at 903 (busing); New Orleans City Park Improvement Assn. v. Detiege, 358 U. S. 54 (1958) (per curiam) (public park…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
SCOTUS · 2023 · confidence medium
Our cases had thus “consistently denied the constitutionality of meas- ures which restrict the rights of citizens on account of race.” Id., at 11–12; see also Yick Wo, 118 U. S., at 373–375 (commer- cial property); Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U. S. 1 (1948) (housing covenants); Hernandez v. Texas, 347 U. S. 475 (1954) (composi- tion of juries); Dawson, 350 U. S., at 877 (beaches and bath- 206 STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE Opinion of the Court houses); Holmes v. Atlanta, 350 U. S. 879 (1955) (per curiam) (golf courses); Browder, 352 U. S., at…
discussed Cited "see" King v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Or. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gayle v. Browder, 352 US 903 , 77 S Ct 145 , 1 L Ed 2d 114 (1956) citing Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 , 74 S Ct 686 , 98 L Ed 873 (1954); see also cases listed in Annot., 87 ALR2d 120, 140 (1963); 26 Op Att’y Gen 208 (Or 1954) (it is a violation of the act to serve black customers in one area of a restaurant and white customers in another area.) 6 *202 In short, the statutory prohibition against “distinction, discrimination or restriction” on the basis of race encompasses more than the outright denial of service.
cited Cited "see" Evers v. Dwyer
SCOTUS · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gayle v. Browder, 352 U. S. 903 , affirming the decision of a three-judge District Court reported at 142 F. Supp. 707 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barnes-Wallace v. City of San Diego (2×)
9th Cir. · 2008 · signal: compare · confidence low
United for Separation of Church & State, 454 U.S. 464, 485 , 102 S.Ct. 752 , 70 L.Ed.2d 700 (1982); compare Browder v. Gayle, 142 F.Supp. 707, 711 (M.D.Ala.1956) (“[Plaintiffs, along with most other Negro citizens of the City of Montgomery, have ... re- framed from making use of the transportation facilities provided by Montgomery City Lines, Inc.”), aff'd, 352 U.S. 903 , 77 S.Ct. 145 , 1 L.Ed.2d 114 (1956).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Golden Trade v. Lee Apparel Co. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1992 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Report of Oral Argument, 25 U.S.L.W. 3141 (Nov. 13, 1956), Holophane Co. v. United States, 352 U.S. 903 , 77 S.Ct. 144 , 1 L.Ed.2d 114 (1956).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. First National City Bank (2×)
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Report of Oral Argument, 25 U.S. L.W. 3141 (Nov. 13, 1956), Holophane Co. v. United States, 352 U.S. 903 , 77 S. Ct. 144 , 1 L.Ed.2d 114 (1956).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. First National City Bank (2×)
1st Cir. · 1968 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Report of Oral Argument, 25 U.S. L.W. 3141 (Nov. 13, 1956), Holophane Co. v. United States, 352 U.S. 903 , 77 S. Ct. 144 , 1 L.Ed.2d 114 (1956).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Mitchell v. Delaware Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission
Del. Super. Ct. · 1963 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 , 16 S.Ct. 1138 , 41 L.Ed. 256 , with Gayle v. Browder, 352 U.S. 903 , 77 S.Ct. 145 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 114 , affrming, D.C., 142 F.Supp. 707 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lombard v. Louisiana (2×)
SCOTUS · 1963 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U. S. 537 , with Gayle v. Browder, 352 U. S. 903 , affirming, 142 F. Supp. 707 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Borders v. Rippy
5th Cir. · 1957 · signal: see also · confidence low
Bruce v. Stilwell, 5 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 554, 556 ; Carter v. School Board of Arlington County, Va., 4 Cir., 1950, 182 F.2d 531, 536 ; Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board, D.C.E.D.La.1956, 138 F.Supp. 337, 341 , affirmed in Orleans Parish School Board v. Bush, 5 Cir., 1957, 242 F.2d 156, 162 ; see also Browder v. Gayle, D.C.M.D.Ala.1956, 142 F.Supp. 707, 713 , affirmed per curiam 352 U.S. 903 , 77 S.Ct. 145 , 1 L.Ed. 114 . 24 Other applicable principles of law are equally simple and well understood.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Borders v. Rippy
5th Cir. · 1957 · signal: see also · confidence low
Bruce v. Stilwell, 5 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 554, 556 ; Carter v. School Board of Arlington County, Va., 4 Cir., 1950, 182 F.2d 531, 536 ; Bush v. Orleans Parish School Board, D.C.E.D.La.1956, 138 F.Supp. 337, 341 , affirmed in Orleans Parish School Board v. Bush, 5 Cir., 1957, 242 F.2d 156, 162 ; see also Browder v. Gayle, D.C.M.D.Ala.1956, 142 F. Supp. 707, 713 , affirmed per curiam 352 U.S. 903 , 77 S.Ct. 145 , 1 L.Ed. 114 .
Holophane Co., Inc.
v.
United States
No. 2.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1956.
352 U.S. 903
Richard F. Stevens argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Howard F. Burns, Shepard Broad and Lewis Horwitz. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin and Assistant Attorney General Hansen.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 173 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The Court unanimously affirms the judgment and decree of the District Court except paragraph XI, and that paragraph is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.