Cano v. Pennsylvania, 355 U.S. 182 (1957). · Go Syfert
Search
Cano v. Pennsylvania, 355 U.S. 182 (1957). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
54 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Interstate Investors, Inc. v. United States (nysd, 1968-07-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Interstate Investors, Inc. v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. United States, 152 F.Supp. 619 (D.Del.), aff’d per curiam, 355 U.S. 181 , 78 S.Ct. 265 , 2 L.Ed.2d 186 (1957).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CANO
v.
PENNSYLVANIA
No. 538.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1957.
355 U.S. 182
William T. Coleman, Jr. for appellants., Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Leon Ehrlich, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
Published
Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.