green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.3 score
“the seventh amendment ... applies to trial in the united states courts____ trial by jury in civil actions in state courts may be modified by a state or abolished altogether.”
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dyson v. Sposeep
the seventh amendment ... applies to trial in the united states courts____ trial by jury in civil actions in state courts may be modified by a state or abolished altogether.
cited
Cited "see"
Luis Miguel Hernandez v. State
Id. at 765 , 107 S. Ct. at 3109; see Burwell v. Teets, 245 F.2d 154, 163 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 896 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
Luis Miguel Hernandez v. State
Id. at 765 , 107 S.Ct. at 3109; see Burwell v. Teets, 245 F.2d 154, 163 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 896 , 78 S.Ct. 271 , 2 L.Ed.2d 194 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Franchi v. Farmholme, Inc.
(2×)
See Olesen v. Trust Co. of Chicago, 245 F.2d 522, 524 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 896 , 78 S. Ct. 270 , 2 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hawkins v. Robinson
See Burwell v. Teets, 245 F.2d 154, 165 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied 355 U.S. 896 , 78 S.Ct. 271 , 2 L.Ed.2d 194 , reh’g denied 355 U.S. 928 , 78 S.Ct. 385 , 2 L.Ed.2d 358 (1958); United States v. Emory, 468 F.2d 1017, 1020-1021 (8th Cir. 1972); United States v. Powell, 156 F.Supp. 526 , 530 n. 3 (N.D.Cal.1957); United States v. Barbera, 213 F.Supp. 923, 926-927 (S.D.N.Y.1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America Ex Rel. Francisco Castillo, Relator-Appellant v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Greenhaven State Prison, Stormville, New York
(2×)
See, e. g., Burwell v. Teets, 245 F.2d 154, 168 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 896 , 78 S.Ct. 271 , 2 L.Ed.2d 194 (1957); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Fournier Sampedro
See, also, Commonwealth v. Makarewicz, 132 N.E.2d 294 (Mass. 1956) and Burwell v. Teets, 245 F.2d 154 (C.A. 9, 1957), certiorari denied in 355 U.S. 896 (1957). <1 H-i In the fourteenth and last assignment it is alleged that “the trial court committed error in denying the motion for a new trial and rendering judgment against the defendant (1) because the defendant was deprived of his right to a fair and impartial trial and of the due process of law; (2) because the verdict is not supported by the evidence and is contrary to law.” The appellant based his motion for a new trial on the same er…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bandy
v.
Municipal Court of San Antonio Judicial District, Los Angeles County, California
v.
Municipal Court of San Antonio Judicial District, Los Angeles County, California
No. 559.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1957.
District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District. Certiorari denied.