Franklin v. Shelton, 355 U.S. 959 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Franklin v. Shelton, 355 U.S. 959 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: O'Sullivan v. Rivera (nmd, 2004-09-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" O'Sullivan v. Rivera
D.N.M. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Martin v. Tindell, 98 So.2d 473, 476 (Fla.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 959 , 78 S.Ct. 545 , 2 L.Ed.2d 534 (1958).
cited Cited "see" Stormo v. Strong
S.D. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Martin v. Tindell, 98 So.2d 473 (Fla.1957), cert, denied, 355 U.S. 959 , 78 S.Ct. 545 , 2 L.Ed.2d 534 (1958).
discussed Cited "see" Jung Ja Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (2×)
10th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
Standard Industries, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp, 475 F.2d 220, 228 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 829 , 94 S.Ct. 55 , 38 L.Ed.2d 63 ; see Franklin v. Shelton, 250 F.2d 92, 99-100 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 959 , 78 S.Ct. 544 , 2 L.Ed.2d 533 . 150 Furthermore, even though it is true, as plaintiff states, that defendant did not object to many of the errors it now complains of, we acknowledge the proposition asserted by defendant that litigants are entitled to a fair trial and that frequent objections, even though valid, may prejudice the party objecting.
cited Cited "see" Harry Henry and Robert E. Braye, Jr. v. A/s Ocean and John P. Pederson & Sons, and Third-Party & v. Pittston Stevedoring Corporation, Third-Party
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Franklin v. Shelton, 250 F.2d 92, 97 (10th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 959 , 78 S.Ct. 544 , 2 L.Ed.2d 533 (1958); Sheptur v. Procter & Gamble Dist.
cited Cited "see" Community National Life Insurance Company, an Insurance Corporation v. Parker Square Savings and Loan Association, a Corporation
10th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Franklin v. Shelton, 250 F.2d 92, 98 (10th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 959 , 78 S.Ct. 544 , 2 L.Ed.2d 533 (1958) ; Pittman v. Harvey, 261 F.2d 44, 45 (10th Cir. 1958). 10 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hull v. Sun Refining and Marketing Co. (2×)
Okla. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Franklin v. Shelton, 250 F.2d 92, 96 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 959 , 78 S.Ct. 544 , 2 L.Ed.2d 533 (1958). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Catherine B. Ramsey v. Charles H. Culpepper and the Farmington Investment Company
10th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
We are aware that “appellate courts should exercise great caution in setting aside a judgment because of remarks made by counsel in closing argument during a hotly contested case, and even though the argument be improper, the judgment should not be disturbed unless it clearly appears that the remarks in question unduly aroused the sympathy of the jury and thereby influenced the verdict.” Julander v. Ford Motor Co., 488 F.2d 839, 842 (10th Cir.1973); See also Franklin v. Shelton, 250 F.2d 92, 99 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 959 , 78 S.Ct. 544 , 2 L.Ed.2d 533 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Franklin
v.
Shelton
No. 742.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1958.
355 U.S. 959
John B. Ogden and Josh Lee for petitioner. R. M. Mountcastle for respondents.
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.