DuPont v. Crummer Co., 358 U.S. 884 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
DuPont v. Crummer Co., 358 U.S. 884 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
118 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 36 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Corporate Communications Consultants, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries Inc. (nysd, 1983-12-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Corporate Communications Consultants, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 258 F.2d 124, 136 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 884 , 79 S.Ct. 124 , 3 L.Ed.2d 112 (1958). 7 .
discussed Cited "see" The Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. U. S. Plywood Corp., 258 F.2d 124, 136 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 884 , 79 S.Ct. 124 , 3 L.Ed.2d 112 (1958).
cited Cited "see" The Barr Rubber Products Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. The Sun Rubber Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross and Wonder Products Company
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 258 F.2d 124, 133 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 884 , 79 S.Ct. 124 , 3 L.Ed.2d 112 (1958).” 277 F.Supp. at 498 .
discussed Cited "see" Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 258 F.2d 124, 133-134 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 884 , 79 S.Ct. 124 (1958); Consolidated Car Heating Co., Inc. v. Chrome-Gold Alloys Corp., 109 F.Supp. 652, 654 (N.D.N.Y.1952).
discussed Cited "see" Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company
S.D.N.Y. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 258 F.2d 124, 133 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 884 , *499 79 S.Ct. 124 , 3 L.Ed.2d 112 (1958); Cold Metal Process Company v. Republic Steel Corp., 233 F.2d 828 , 837 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 891 , 77 S.Ct. 128 , 1 L.Ed.2d 86 (1956); Novadel-Agene Corporation v. Penn, 119 F.2d 764, 766 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 645 , 62 S.Ct. 85 , 86 L.Ed. 517 (1941).
discussed Cited "see" Rooted Hair, Inc. v. Ideal Toy Corp., and a & B Wig Co., Inc. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 258 F.2d 124 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 884 , 79 S.Ct. 124 , 3 L.Ed.2d 112 (1958).
cited Cited "see" Karl E. Stiegele and Speidel Corporation v. J. M. Moore Import-Export Co., Inc., Moore Products Corporation and Joseph Mitchell Moore
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp., 2 Cir., 258 F.2d 124, 133 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 884 , 79 S.Ct. 124 , 3 L.Ed.2d 112 (1958).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." A. Ernest Fitzgerald v. Robert C. Seamans, Jr.
D.C. Cir. · 1977 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Crummer Co. v. DuPont, 255 F.2d 425 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 884 , 79 S.Ct. 119 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958), applying the discovery standard to an alleged antitrust conspiracy accomplished by “fraudulent use by the appellees of the governmental bodies whose investigations are by law largely kept secret ..” Id. at 432.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DuPont, Trustees
v.
Crummer Company
No. 366.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1958.
358 U.S. 884
John Lord O’Brian and Hugh B. Cox for petitioners. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Ralph M. McLane, Assistant Attorney General, for Shafer et al., Donald Russell and Clarence G. Ashby for Ball et al., Charles R. Scott for the St. Joe Paper Co., and H. M. Voorhis and W. H. Poe for Leedy, Wheeler & Alleman, Inc., et ah, petitioners. Francis P. Whitehair, Chris Dixie and Warren E. Hall, Jr. for respondents.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 117 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.