green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2001 ·
…without converting it into a criminal penalty, a statutory forfeiture of money has always been demandable of a wrongdoer by civil process though its purpose and effect be punishment.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
MALONE
But see De Souza v. Rarbar, 263 F.2d 470 (9th Cir., 1959), cert. den. 359 U.S. 989 ).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. AMERICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC.
having by his fraud thrust this burden on the united states, the cannot be exonerated by the failure of the government to cast it off at the most propitious time.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
US Ex Rel. Rosales v. SAN FRAN. HOUSING AUTHOR.
without converting it into a criminal penalty, a statutory forfeiture of money has always been demandable of a wrongdoer by civil process though its purpose and effect be punishment.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States ex rel. Rosales v. San Francisco Housing Authority
without converting it into a criminal penalty, a statutory forfeiture of money has always been demandable of a wrongdoer by civil process though its purpose and effect be punishment.
cited
Cited "see"
Stein v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
See Tomlin v. McDaniel, 865 F.2d 209, 210 (9th Cir.1989) (citing Title v. United States, 263 F.2d 28, 31 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 989 , 79 S.Ct. 1118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 978 (1959)).
cited
Cited "see"
Mateo Sebastian-Pedro v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See De Souza v. Barber, 263 F.2d 470, 477 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 989 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Watson
See DeSouza v. Barber (C.A. 9, 1959), 263 F. 2d 470 , certiorari denied (1959), 359 U.S. 989 , and Olivera v. State (Okla.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Shoup Larry R. Shoup, Sr. v. Bell & Howell Company
(2×)
See 365 U.S. at 285 , 81 S.Ct. at 544 , citing Title v. United States, 263 F.2d 28, 30 (9th Cir.1959) (affidavit a "procedural", rather than "jurisdictional", prerequisite), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 989 , 79 S.Ct. 1118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 978 (1959); United States v. Failla, 164 F.Supp. 307, 313 (D.N.J.1958) (affidavit requirement may be waived by defendant). 28 The policies underlying Rule 41(b) demonstrate that limitations dismissals do not constitute adjudications on the merits: 29 All of the dismissals enumerated in Rule 41(b) which operate as adjudications on the merits ... primarily involve situat…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. CFW Const. Co., Inc.
See generally Toepleman v. United States, 263 F.2d 697, 699 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 989 , 79 S.Ct. 1119 , 3 L.Ed.2d 978 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Weiker
(2×)
See United States v. Cato Bros., Inc., 273 F.2d 153, 157 (4th Cir.1959), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 989 , 79 S.Ct. 1119 , 3 L.Ed.2d 978 (1959); accord, United States v. Redmond, 571 F.2d 513 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 995 , 98 S.Ct. 1645 , 56 L.Ed.2d 83 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27
See Title v. United States, 263 F.2d 28 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 359 U.S. 989 , 79 S.Ct. 1118 , 3 L.Ed.2d 978 (1959); Collins v. City of Wichita, 254 F.2d 837 (10th Cir. 1958); Berryhill v. United States, 199 F.2d 217 (6th Cir. 1952). 17 *651 III In United States v. Swift & Co., 286 U.S. 106 , 52 S.Ct. 460 , 76 L.Ed. 999 (1932), the Court held that it was the inherent right of a court of equity to modify an injunction in adaptation to changed circumstances which rendered the injunction an instrument of wrong.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles Hughes
See also Toepleman v. United States, 263 F.2d 697 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 989 , 79 S.Ct. 1119 , 3 L.Ed.2d 978 (1959).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Berman
v.
United States and Fabric Garment Co., Inc. v. United States
v.
United States and Fabric Garment Co., Inc. v. United States
No. 732. No. 733.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 18, 1959.
Milton C.Weis-man and Harry I. Rand for petitioners in No. 732., Simon H. Rifkind for petitioners in No. 733., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Robert S. Erdahl and Eugene L. Grimm for the. United States.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. California (2) · E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 262 F. 2d 631.