green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Young
See State v. Outen, 237 S.C. 514 , 118 S.E. (2d) 175 (1961) cert. denied 366 U.S. 977 , 81 S. Ct. 1948 , 6 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Michael James Decca, John Anton Slack and Howard Nelson Zinram v. United States
See Murgia v. United States, 9 Cir., 285 F.2d 14 , cert. denied 366 U.S. 977 , 81 S.Ct. 1946 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1265 , and Mansfield v. United States, 5 Cir., 308 F.2d 221 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tee Ann Wilson v. United States
See Nickens v. United States, 116 U.S. App.D.C. 338, 342, 323 F.2d 808, 812 (1963) (concurring opinion of Judge Wright) ; see Trent v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 152 , 156, 284 F.2d 286, 290 (1960) (dissenting opinion of Judge Bazelon), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 889 , 81 S.Ct. 1035 , 6 L.Ed.2d 199 (1961), rehearing denied, 366 U.S. 978 , 81 S.Ct. 1928 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1268 (1961); Hawkins v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 338 , 340, 288 F.2d 122, 124 (1960) (concurring opinion of Judge Bazelon).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sterling H. Nickens v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Trent v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C 152, 156, 284 F.2d 286, 290 (1960) (dissenting opinion of Judge Bazelon), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 889 , 81 S.Ct. 1035 , 6 L.Ed.2d 199 (1961), rehearing denied, 366 U.S. 978 , 81 S.Ct. 1928 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1268 (1961); Hawkins v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 338 , 340, 288 F.2d 122, 124 (1960) (concurring opinion of Judge Bazelon). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Miles
v.
Settle, Warden
v.
Settle, Warden
No. 740, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 19, 1961.
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and Isabel L. Blair for respondent.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied without prejudice to another application under 28 U. S. C. § 2255 to the appropriate District Court, which application should be considered on its merits and not as a successive application.