green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Gene Berryhill, Cross-Appellant v. Walter Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
See Coppedge v. United States, 272 F.2d 504, 507-08 (D.C.Cir.1959) (had juror admitted before his fellow jurors that he was influenced because of a newspaper article which reported that prosecutor had stated that the defendant was a vicious criminal, that witness was deathly afraid of the defendant, and that district court did not believe that witness could be protected, “the damage to the defendant would have been spread to the listening other jurors”), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 855 , 82 S.Ct. 92 , 7 L.Ed.2d 52 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas Carlton Wansley v. A. E. Slayton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary
See, United States v. Bowe (2d Cir. 1966) 360 F.2d 1, 12 , cert, denied 385 U.S. 961 , 87 S.Ct. 401 , 17 L.Ed.2d 306 , reh. denied 386 U.S. 969 , 87 S.Ct. 1040 , 18 L.Ed.2d 127 , where the Court very clearly marks out the difference between “prejudicial information during the trials” and prejudicial publicity antedating trial in distinguishing United States v. Accardo (7th Cir. 1962) 298 F.2d 133 , and Coppedge v. United States (1959), 106 U.S.App.D.C. 275 , 272 F.2d 504 , cert, denied 368 U.S. 855 , 82 S.Ct. 92 , 7 L.Ed.2d 52 , both of which involved “exposure of jurors to prejudicial i…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent N. Colabella
See Silverthorne v. United States, 400 F.2d 627 (9th Cir. 1968) (evidence of wide-spread community prejudice because of pre-trial publicity). 5 See also *1304 Coppedge v. United States, 106 U.S. App.D.C. 275, 272 F.2d 504 (1959), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 855 , 82 S.Ct. 92 , 7 L.Ed.2d 52 (1961), where in reversing the conviction the Court said: It is too much to expect of human nature that a juror would volunteer, in open court, before his fellow jurors, that he would be influenced in his verdict by a newspaper story of the trial, No only so, but had one or more of them said they would be so infl…
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur Mares v. United States
See Coppedge v. United States, 106 U. S.App.D.C. 275, 272 F.2d 504, 508 , cert. denied 368 U.S. 855 , 82 S.Ct. 92 , 7 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Loray
See also In re State in Interest of Steenback, 34 N.J. 89 (1961), and Goodlet v. Goodman, 34 N.J. 358 (1961), cert. denied 368 U.S. 855 , 82 S.Ct. 92 , 7 L.Ed. 2 d 52 (1961).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Loray
See also In re State in Interest of Steenback, 34 N .J. 89 (1961), and Goodlet v. Goodman, 34 N. J. 358 (1961), cert. denied 368 U. S. 855 , 82 S. Ct. 92 , 7 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cooper
v.
Missouri
v.
Missouri
No. 204.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1961.
368 U.S. 855
Published
Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.