green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
“as a general rule, habeas corpus (or its statutory counterpart in post-conviction proceedings) does not provide relief from a conviction resulting from a mistake of fact, where proof of the jury's mistake must depend upon the credibility of newly discovered evidence.”
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Reeves v. Nooth
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
as a general rule, habeas corpus (or its statutory counterpart in post-conviction proceedings) does not provide relief from a conviction resulting from a mistake of fact, where proof of the jury's mistake must depend upon the credibility of newly discovered evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David William Roberts
See Sigman v. United States, 320 F.2d 176, 177-78 (9th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 967 , 84 S.Ct. 485 , 11 L.Ed.2d 415 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mckenzie v. Lamb
See Nesmith v. Alford, 318 F.2d 110, 115-21 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 975 , 84 S.Ct. 489 , 11 L.Ed.2d 420 (1964) (reversing jury verdict for the defendants on issue of probable cause as unreasonable). 11 Conclusive evidence of guilt is not necessary to establish probable cause.
discussed
Cited "see"
McKenzie v. Lamb
See Nesmith v. Alford, 318 F.2d 110, 115-21 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 975 , 84 S.Ct. 489 , 11 L.Ed.2d 420 (1964) (reversing jury verdict for the defendants on issue of probable cause as unreasonable).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beker Phosphate Corp. v. Muirhead
See Nesmith v. Alford, 318 F.2d 110, 126 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 975 , 84 S.Ct. 489 , 11 L.Ed.2d 420 (1964); Moffett v. Commerce Trust Co., 187 F.2d 242, 248 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 918 , 72 S.Ct. 32 , 96 L.Ed. 618 (1951), quoting Bottone v. Lindsley, 170 F.2d 705, 707 (10th Cir. 1948); Wyland v. James, 426 F.Supp. 304 (N.D.Tex.1977). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Katie Ruth Anderson v. J. J. Nosser, James Bradley v. J. J. Nosser
(2×)
See Nesmith v. Alford, 5 Cir. 1963, 318 F.2d 110, 119 , cert. denied, 375 U.S. 975 , 84 S.Ct. 489 , 11 L.Ed.2d 420 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mora v. Cupp
(2×)
See Anderson v. Gladden, 234 Or 614 , 383 P2d 986 (1963), cert denied 375 US 975 , 84 S Ct 485 , 11 L Ed 2d 420 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Basista v. Weir
See Nesmith v. Alford, 318 F.2d 110, 124 (5 Cir. 1963), cert. denied 375 U.S. 975 , 84 S.Ct. 489 , 11 L.Ed.2d 420 (1964); Cohen v. Norris, 300 F.2d 24 (9 Cir. 1962); Hughes v. Noble, 295 F.2d 495 (5 Cir. 1961); Brazier v. Cherry, 293 F.2d 401 (5 Cir. 1961); Coleman v. Johnston, 247 F.2d 273 (7 Cir. 1957); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Basista v. Weir
See Nesmith v. Alford, 318 F.2d 110, 124 (5 Cir. 1963), cert. denied 375 U.S. 975 , 84 S.Ct. 489 , 11 L.Ed.2d 420 (1964); Cohen v. Norris, 300 F.2d 24 (9 Cir. 1962); Hughes v. Noble, 295 F.2d 495 (5 Cir. 1961); Brazier v. Cherry, 293 F.2d 401 (5 Cir. 1961); Coleman v. Johnston, 247 F.2d 273 (7 Cir. 1957); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R.J.D. v. Vaughan Clinic, P.C.
(2×)
See also Nesmith v. Alford, 318 F.2d 110 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 975 (1964); Daniels v. Milstead, 221 Ala. 353 , 128 So. 447 (1930).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald P. Richardson v. Les Fleming
See also Nesmith v. Alford, 318 F.2d 110 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 975 , 84 S.Ct. 489 , 11 L.Ed.2d 420 (1964). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simpson Sartin, Jr. v. The Commissioner of Public Safety of the State of Minnesota
Compare Paskaly v. Seale, 506 F.2d 1209, 1212 (9th Cir. 1974), with Nesmith v. Alford, 318 F.2d 110, 126 (5th Cir. 1963) (dictum), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 975 , 84 S.Ct. 489 , 11 L.Ed.2d 420 (1964). 3 .
Anderson
v.
Gladden, Warden
v.
Gladden, Warden
No. 570.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 6, 1964.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)
The motion to dispense with printing the petition for certiorari is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon denied.