Auclair Transp., Inc. v. United States, 376 U.S. 514 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Auclair Transp., Inc. v. United States, 376 U.S. 514 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pratt v. Nelson (utahctapp, 2005-12-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Pratt v. Nelson
Utah Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fawcett Publ’ns, Inc. v. Morris, 377 P.2d 42, 51-52 (Okla.1962) (holding that a single member of a large university football team could maintain a lawsuit for libel for general statements about the team since he was “well known and identified in connection with the group” and because he “ha[d] sufficiently established his identity as one of those libeled by the publication”), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 513 , 84 S.Ct. 964 , 11 L.Ed.2d 968 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AUCLAIR TRANSPORTATION, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
724.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1964.
376 U.S. 514
Per Curiam.
Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS.

Peter T. Beardsley and Richard R. Sigmon for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and William J. Taylor for Railway Express Agency, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.