United States v. First Nat'l City Bank, 377 U.S. 951 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. First Nat'l City Bank, 377 U.S. 951 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Ray Roya (ca7, 1978-04-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ray Roya
7th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
The denial of a motion for a bill of particulars does not constitute an abuse of discretion “unless the deprivation of the information sought leads to the defendant’s inability adequately prepare his case, to avoid surprise at trial, or to avoid the later risk of double jeopardy.” United States v. Addonizio, 451 F.2d 49, 64 (3d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936 , 92 S.Ct. 949 , 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972); see also United States v. Micele, 327 F.2d 222 , 226 *392 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 952 , 84 S.Ct. 1627 , 12 L.Ed.2d 496 ; Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal…
United States
v.
First National City Bank
998.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1964.
377 U.S. 951
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

377 U.S. 951

84 S.Ct. 1629

12 L.Ed.2d 496

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK.

No. 998.

Supreme Court of the United States

June 1, 1964

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Harold C. Wilkenfeld, for the United States.

Henry Harfield, for respondent.

1

Edward J. Ross, for Chase Manhattan Bank and others, as amici curiae.

2

Facts and opinion, U. S. v. Omar, S.A., D.C., 210 F.Supp. 773; 321 F.2d 14; 325 F.2d 1020.

3

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted and case placed on the summary calendar.