green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Boyd v. Sachs (In Re Auto Specialties Manufacturing Co.)
See United States v. Gotdfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 281-82 (6th Cir.), cert. den. 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willis
Letters from Attorney to Third Parties The attorney-client privilege does not “conceal everything said and done in connection with an attorney’s legal representation of a client in a matter.” Fischel, supra, 557 F.2d at 212 ; see United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 281-82 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Blier Cedar Co., Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re January 1976 Grand Jury. Edward M. Genson, Attorney at Law, Witness-Appellant v. United States
See United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 283 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 ; Accord, Bouschor v. United States, 316 F.2d 451, 458 (8th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hewes v. Langston
See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hewes v. Langston
See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George P. Hewes, III v. Cynthia Langston
See also United States v. Goldarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl. 1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum to Johnson, Grusin, Key and May. United States of America v. John Doe
See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Boyles v. Mid-Florida Television Corp.
See also U.S. v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jesse Ray Pipkins
See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl. 1967) , aff’d sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir. 1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dombrowski
v.
Pfister, Chairman, Joint Legislative Committee on Un-American Activities of the Louisiana Legislature
v.
Pfister, Chairman, Joint Legislative Committee on Un-American Activities of the Louisiana Legislature
No. 941.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 15, 1964.
Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler, Michael J. Kunstler, A. P. Tureaud and Leon Hubert for appellants., Jack N. Rogers and Robert H. Reiter for the Joint Legislative Committee on Un-American Activities. Ernest Goodman and David Rein for National Lawyers Guild, as amicus curiae, in support of appellants., Louis Lusky and Melvin L. Wulf for American Civil Liberties Union et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellants. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and M. E. Culligan and John E. Jackson, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, filed an objection and opposition to the motion of National Lawyers Guild.
Consideration, Took.
Published
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The motion of the National Lawyers Guild for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. The motion of the American Civil Liberties Union et al. for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, is granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.