Lefkowitz v. Tomlinson, 379 U.S. 962 (1965). · Go Syfert
Lefkowitz v. Tomlinson, 379 U.S. 962 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
245 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 63 distinct courts.
Negative lean: 9th  ·  Positive lean: 5th, 7th, 3rd, 10th, 2nd, 6th, 11th
Strongest positive: Younis Bros. & Co., Inc. v. CIGNA Worldwide Ins. Co. (paed, 1994-11-16) · Strongest negative: Treadaway v. Academy Of Motion Picture Arts And Sciences (ca9, 1986-03-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Treadaway v. Academy Of Motion Picture Arts And Sciences
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, e.g., Locklin v. Switzer Brothers, Inc., 335 F.2d 331 , 334-35 & n. 9 (7th Cir.1964) (noting the decision in Lapin, but entertaining an independent action seeking relief from a judgment of a California district court), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 652 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965) 3 The "artful pleading" doctrine has been developed in the context of removal jurisdiction to prevent plaintiffs from foreclosing defendants' rightful access to federal fora by framing their complaints in an artificial and deceptive manner.
discussed Cited "but see" Treadaway v. Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, e.g., Locklin v. Switzer Brothers, Inc., 335 F.2d 331 , 334-35 & n. 9 (7th Cir.1964) (noting the decision in Lapin , but entertaining an independent action seeking relief from a judgment of a California district court), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 652 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965). .
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Younis Bros. & Co., Inc. v. CIGNA Worldwide Ins. Co.
E.D. Pa. · 1994 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
exemplary damages and attorneys' fees are not money claims triable by jury, although they are awarded in a legal action.
discussed Cited "see" Rivera Rosa v. Citibank, N.A.
D.P.R. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Swofford v. B. & W., Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 409 (5 th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965). 2 After discussing both approaches, the First Circuit Court of Appeals held it was “of the view that the discretion under Rule 39(b) is very broad and that the case would be very rare indeed where a district court abused its discretion in denying or granting a Rule 39(b) motion.” Rowlett, 832 F.2d, at p. 200 .
cited Cited "see" Laitram Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
E.D. La. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 34 F.R.D. 15, 19-20 (S.D.Tex.1963), aff'd, 336 F.2d 406 (5 Cir.1964), *115 ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed Cited "see" Rick v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tomlinson v. Lefkowitz, 334 F. 2d 262 (5th Cir. 1964) , cert. denied 379 U.S. 962 (1965) ; Artic Ice Cream Co. v. Commissioner, 43 T.C. 68 (1964) ; Amos v. Commission, 43 T.C. 50 (1964) , affd. 360 F. 2d 358 ↩ (4th Cir. 1965) . 12.
discussed Cited "see" Rohm and Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
D. Del. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965); E-I-M Co. v. Philadelphia Gear Works, Inc., 223 F.2d 36 (5th Cir.1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 933 , 76 S.Ct. 304 , 100 L.Ed. 815 (1956); Jeoffroy Manufacturing, Inc. v. Graham, 206 F.2d 772 (5th Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 920 , 74 S.Ct. 515 , 98 L.Ed. 1075 (1954); Pyle National Co. v. Lewin, 92 F.2d 628 (7th Cir.1937); Anchor Hocking Glass Corp. v. White Cap Co., 47 F.Supp. 451 (D.Del.1942).
cited Cited "see" Patlex Corporation v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Etc.
Fed. Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 , 142 USPQ 291 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed Cited "see" Verdia JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BIRDSONG, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees (2×)
5th Cir. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Swofford v. B&W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 409 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S. Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965); Albert v. R.
discussed Cited "see" Rosack v. Volvo of America Corp.
Cal. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 34 F.R.D. 15 (S.D.Tex. 1963), affd., 336 F.2d 406 , 415 (5th Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 14 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).” (Freeman, Current Issues in Class Action Litigation, supra, 70 F.R.D. 251 , 267-268, fn. omitted.) Various practical methods have been devised to expeditiously facilitate the calculation of individual damages, including bifurcation and the creation of subclasses.
discussed Cited "see" Brad Ragan, Inc. v. Shrader's Inc.
S.D. Ohio · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 34 F.R.D. 15 (S.D.Tex.1963), aff’d., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965) (jury trial; trial of damage issue in patent cases is “often difficult and expensive” yet “easily severed” from liability questions; additional opportunity for avoiding or settling damage issue created by separation; nonmovants failed to show “serious prejudice” in separation) (on appeal, court could not “think of an instance in a patent action where the damage issue is so interwoven with the other issues” that separ…
cited Cited "see" DC Comics, Inc. v. Filmation Associates
S.D.N.Y. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Swofford v. B&W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed Cited "see" Consolidated-Hammer Dry Plate & Film Co. v. Commissioner
7th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Julius Garfinckel & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 335 F.2d 744 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. den. 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 651 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Frank IX & Sons Virginia Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 375 F.2d 867 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. den. 389 U.S. 900 , 88 S.Ct. 215 , 19 L.Ed.2d 217 .
discussed Cited "see" Consolidated-Hammer Dry Plate & Film Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Consolidated-Hammer Dry Plate & Film Company
7th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Julius Garfinckel & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 335 F.2d 744 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. den. 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 651 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Frank IX & Sons Virginia Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 375 F.2d 867 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. den. 389 U.S. 900 , 88 S.Ct. 215 , 19 L.Ed.2d 217 .
discussed Cited "see" Meridan Corporation v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Julius Garfinckel & Co., Inc. v. Commissioner, 335 F.2d 744 (2nd Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 651 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 (1965); Huyler’s v. Commissioner, 327 F.2d 767 (7th Cir. 1964).
cited Cited "see" Westinghouse Air Brake Company v. The United States
Ct. Cl. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Julius Garfinckel & Co. v. Commissioner, 335 F.2d 744, 748 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 651 (1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Blinkoff v. Torrington
D. Conn. · 2023 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Locklin v. Switzer Bros., Inc., 335 F.2d 331, 334 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 (1965) (“denial of post-trial motions” may potentially serve as basis for “res judicata of a later independent action to set aside judgment on the same grounds”); Brown v. Bureau of Reclamation, 2008 WL 4239006 , at *2 (D.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Jenouri v. WAPA-TV Pegasus Broadcasting of San Juan, Inc.
D.P.R. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also Swofford v. B. & W., Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 409 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Shaw
S.D. Miss. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
Addressing the collateral estoppel effect of a prior criminal conviction, the Fifth Circuit has explained that “[bjecause of the existence of a higher standard of proof and greater procedural protections in a criminal prosecution, a conviction is conclusive as to an issue arising against the criminal defendant in a subsequent civil action.” United States v. Thomas, 709 F.2d 968, 972 (5th Cir.1983); see also Tomlinson v. Lefkowitz, 334 F.2d 262, 264 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 650 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 (1965).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Mag Instrument, Inc. v. J. Baxter Brinkmann International Corp.
N.D. Tex. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965); Slater Electric, Inc. v. Indian Head, Inc., 38 Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Myron J. Palermo
10th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2334 at 112 (1971); see also Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 408-09 (5th Cir.1964) (untimely demand for jury trial under Rule 38(b) has the effect of a motion for jury trial under Rule 39(b)), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. James F. Magnus
7th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Russo, 335 F.2d 299, 301 (7th Cir.1964) (where several counts were presented to one jury, “[a] verdict of acquittal on one count does not invalidate a verdict of guilty on another count, even where the same evidence is offered in support of each count”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 651 (1965).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lee Pharmaceuticals v. Mishler
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Swofford v. B & W, Incorporated, 336 F.2d 406 , 410 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cleveland J. Stockton and Dorothy Altman Stockton v. John A. Altman, and Eleanor Altman Curran
5th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 5th Cir. 1964, 336 F.2d 406 , cert. denied 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965) and Thermo-Stitch, Inc. v. Chemi-Cord Processing Corp., 5th Cir. 1961, 294 F.2d 486 . .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Petition of Petrol Shipping Corporation, as Owner of Tanker Atlantis, for an Order Directing the Kingdom of Greece, Ministry of Commerce, Purchase Directorate, to Proceed to Arbitration
2d Cir. · 1966 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 423-427 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964). 35 In the light of the above, we are not disposed to follow Oster v. Dominion of Canada, 144 F.Supp. 746 (N.D.N.Y.), aff'd 238 F.2d 400 (2 Cir. 1956), cert. den. 353 U.S. 936 , 77 S.Ct. 813 , 1 L.Ed.2d 759 (1957), 3 or Purdy Co. v. Argentina, 333 F.2d 95 (7 Cir. 1964), cert. den. 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965), to the extent they hold that a sovereign cannot be served in federal court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lefkowitz et ux.
v.
Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue
No. 572.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
379 U.S. 962
E. David Roseniov petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Burton Berkley for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.