green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Treadaway v. Academy Of Motion Picture Arts And Sciences
But see, e.g., Locklin v. Switzer Brothers, Inc., 335 F.2d 331 , 334-35 & n. 9 (7th Cir.1964) (noting the decision in Lapin, but entertaining an independent action seeking relief from a judgment of a California district court), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 652 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965) 3 The "artful pleading" doctrine has been developed in the context of removal jurisdiction to prevent plaintiffs from foreclosing defendants' rightful access to federal fora by framing their complaints in an artificial and deceptive manner.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Treadaway v. Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences
But see, e.g., Locklin v. Switzer Brothers, Inc., 335 F.2d 331 , 334-35 & n. 9 (7th Cir.1964) (noting the decision in Lapin , but entertaining an independent action seeking relief from a judgment of a California district court), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 652 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965). .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Younis Bros. & Co., Inc. v. CIGNA Worldwide Ins. Co.
exemplary damages and attorneys' fees are not money claims triable by jury, although they are awarded in a legal action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera Rosa v. Citibank, N.A.
See, Swofford v. B. & W., Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 409 (5 th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965). 2 After discussing both approaches, the First Circuit Court of Appeals held it was “of the view that the discretion under Rule 39(b) is very broad and that the case would be very rare indeed where a district court abused its discretion in denying or granting a Rule 39(b) motion.” Rowlett, 832 F.2d, at p. 200 .
cited
Cited "see"
Laitram Corp. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 34 F.R.D. 15, 19-20 (S.D.Tex.1963), aff'd, 336 F.2d 406 (5 Cir.1964), *115 ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rick v. Commissioner
See Tomlinson v. Lefkowitz, 334 F. 2d 262 (5th Cir. 1964) , cert. denied 379 U.S. 962 (1965) ; Artic Ice Cream Co. v. Commissioner, 43 T.C. 68 (1964) ; Amos v. Commission, 43 T.C. 50 (1964) , affd. 360 F. 2d 358 ↩ (4th Cir. 1965) . 12.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rohm and Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965); E-I-M Co. v. Philadelphia Gear Works, Inc., 223 F.2d 36 (5th Cir.1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 933 , 76 S.Ct. 304 , 100 L.Ed. 815 (1956); Jeoffroy Manufacturing, Inc. v. Graham, 206 F.2d 772 (5th Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 920 , 74 S.Ct. 515 , 98 L.Ed. 1075 (1954); Pyle National Co. v. Lewin, 92 F.2d 628 (7th Cir.1937); Anchor Hocking Glass Corp. v. White Cap Co., 47 F.Supp. 451 (D.Del.1942).
cited
Cited "see"
Patlex Corporation v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Etc.
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 , 142 USPQ 291 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Verdia JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BIRDSONG, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
(2×)
Accord, Swofford v. B&W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 409 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S. Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965); Albert v. R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosack v. Volvo of America Corp.
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 34 F.R.D. 15 (S.D.Tex. 1963), affd., 336 F.2d 406 , 415 (5th Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 14 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).” (Freeman, Current Issues in Class Action Litigation, supra, 70 F.R.D. 251 , 267-268, fn. omitted.) Various practical methods have been devised to expeditiously facilitate the calculation of individual damages, including bifurcation and the creation of subclasses.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brad Ragan, Inc. v. Shrader's Inc.
See Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 34 F.R.D. 15 (S.D.Tex.1963), aff’d., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965) (jury trial; trial of damage issue in patent cases is “often difficult and expensive” yet “easily severed” from liability questions; additional opportunity for avoiding or settling damage issue created by separation; nonmovants failed to show “serious prejudice” in separation) (on appeal, court could not “think of an instance in a patent action where the damage issue is so interwoven with the other issues” that separ…
cited
Cited "see"
DC Comics, Inc. v. Filmation Associates
See Swofford v. B&W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated-Hammer Dry Plate & Film Co. v. Commissioner
See Julius Garfinckel & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 335 F.2d 744 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. den. 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 651 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Frank IX & Sons Virginia Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 375 F.2d 867 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. den. 389 U.S. 900 , 88 S.Ct. 215 , 19 L.Ed.2d 217 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated-Hammer Dry Plate & Film Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Consolidated-Hammer Dry Plate & Film Company
See Julius Garfinckel & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 335 F.2d 744 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. den. 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 651 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 ; Frank IX & Sons Virginia Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 375 F.2d 867 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. den. 389 U.S. 900 , 88 S.Ct. 215 , 19 L.Ed.2d 217 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Meridan Corporation v. United States
See Julius Garfinckel & Co., Inc. v. Commissioner, 335 F.2d 744 (2nd Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 651 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 (1965); Huyler’s v. Commissioner, 327 F.2d 767 (7th Cir. 1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Westinghouse Air Brake Company v. The United States
See Julius Garfinckel & Co. v. Commissioner, 335 F.2d 744, 748 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 651 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blinkoff v. Torrington
See, e.g., Locklin v. Switzer Bros., Inc., 335 F.2d 331, 334 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 (1965) (“denial of post-trial motions” may potentially serve as basis for “res judicata of a later independent action to set aside judgment on the same grounds”); Brown v. Bureau of Reclamation, 2008 WL 4239006 , at *2 (D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jenouri v. WAPA-TV Pegasus Broadcasting of San Juan, Inc.
Id.; see also Swofford v. B. & W., Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 409 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shaw
Addressing the collateral estoppel effect of a prior criminal conviction, the Fifth Circuit has explained that “[bjecause of the existence of a higher standard of proof and greater procedural protections in a criminal prosecution, a conviction is conclusive as to an issue arising against the criminal defendant in a subsequent civil action.” United States v. Thomas, 709 F.2d 968, 972 (5th Cir.1983); see also Tomlinson v. Lefkowitz, 334 F.2d 262, 264 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 650 , 13 L.Ed.2d 556 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mag Instrument, Inc. v. J. Baxter Brinkmann International Corp.
See, e.g., Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965); Slater Electric, Inc. v. Indian Head, Inc., 38 Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Myron J. Palermo
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2334 at 112 (1971); see also Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 336 F.2d 406, 408-09 (5th Cir.1964) (untimely demand for jury trial under Rule 38(b) has the effect of a motion for jury trial under Rule 39(b)), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James F. Magnus
See also United States v. Russo, 335 F.2d 299, 301 (7th Cir.1964) (where several counts were presented to one jury, “[a] verdict of acquittal on one count does not invalidate a verdict of guilty on another count, even where the same evidence is offered in support of each count”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 651 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lee Pharmaceuticals v. Mishler
See also Swofford v. B & W, Incorporated, 336 F.2d 406 , 410 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cleveland J. Stockton and Dorothy Altman Stockton v. John A. Altman, and Eleanor Altman Curran
See also Swofford v. B & W, Inc., 5th Cir. 1964, 336 F.2d 406 , cert. denied 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965) and Thermo-Stitch, Inc. v. Chemi-Cord Processing Corp., 5th Cir. 1961, 294 F.2d 486 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Petition of Petrol Shipping Corporation, as Owner of Tanker Atlantis, for an Order Directing the Kingdom of Greece, Ministry of Commerce, Purchase Directorate, to Proceed to Arbitration
Compare Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 423-427 , 84 S.Ct. 923 , 11 L.Ed.2d 804 (1964). 35 In the light of the above, we are not disposed to follow Oster v. Dominion of Canada, 144 F.Supp. 746 (N.D.N.Y.), aff'd 238 F.2d 400 (2 Cir. 1956), cert. den. 353 U.S. 936 , 77 S.Ct. 813 , 1 L.Ed.2d 759 (1957), 3 or Purdy Co. v. Argentina, 333 F.2d 95 (7 Cir. 1964), cert. den. 379 U.S. 962 , 85 S.Ct. 653 , 13 L.Ed.2d 557 (1965), to the extent they hold that a sovereign cannot be served in federal court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lefkowitz et ux.
v.
Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue
v.
Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue
No. 572.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
E. David Roseniov petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Burton Berkley for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.