green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Testimony of Attorney X
See United States v. Hall, 346 F.2d 875 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 910 , 86 S.Ct. 250 , 15 L.Ed.2d 161 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Payden v. United States
Payden contends that this eventuality will “chill” the attorney-client relationship so as to erode his right to effective assistance of counsel. “[M]erely requiring a defendant’s lawyer to testify does not alone constitute a material interference with his function as an advocate or operate to deprive the accused of a fair trial.” United States v. Freeman, 519 F.2d 67, 68 (9th Cir.1975); accord United States v. Hall, 346 F.2d 875, 882 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 910 & 947, 86 S.Ct. 250 & 408, 15 L.Ed.2d 161 , 355 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Jan. 2, 1985
Payden contends that this eventuality will "chill" the attorney-client relationship so as to erode his right to effective assistance of counsel. "[M]erely requiring a defendant's lawyer to testify does not alone constitute a material interference with his function as an advocate or operate to deprive the accused of a fair trial." United States v. Freeman, 519 F.2d 67, 68 (9th Cir.1975); accord United States v. Hall, 346 F.2d 875, 882 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 910 & 947, 86 S.Ct. 250 & 408, 15 L.Ed.2d 161 , 355 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Ray Abernathy, Daniel David Abernathy
See, e.g., United States v. Hall, 346 F.2d 875 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 910 , 86 S.Ct. 250 , 15 L.Ed.2d 161 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Litteral
See also, the Federal bond jumping statute which requires a wilful act, formerly 18 USC 3146, United States v Hall, 346 F2d 875 (CA 2, 1965), cert den, 382 US 910 ; 86 S Ct 250 ; 15 L Ed 2d 161 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hall
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 523.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 1965.
Leon B. Polsky for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.