green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Brookfield Athletic Shoe Co. v. Chicago Roller Skate Co.
See Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc., 356 F.2d 442, 448 (7th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 950 , 86 S.Ct. 1570 , 16 L.Ed.2d 547 (1966); Freeman v. Hammond Corp., 464 F.Supp. 404, 408 (N.D.Ill.1978). *249 Under these standards, the court concludes that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the issue of obviousness can be decided as a matter of law.
cited
Cited "see"
John Staren and David Henner v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a Corporation
See Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc., 7 Cir., 356 F.2d 442, 446-447 , cert. denied, 384 U.S. 950 and 1002, 86 S.Ct. 1570 , 16 L.Ed.2d 547 (1966). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. United States
See Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc., 356 P. 2d 442 , 443 (C.A. 7, 1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 950 .
cited
Cited "see"
Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. United States
See Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc., 356 F.2d 442, 443 (C.A.7, 1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 950 , 86 S.Ct. 1570 , 16 L.Ed.2d 547 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Getty v. Carroll County Board of Elections
We stated in In re Legislative Districting of the State, 370 Md. 312, 319 , 805 A.2d 292, 296 (2002), heeding the rationale underlying the “one-person, one-vote” standard, 22 enunciated by the Supreme Court in the landmark decision in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 , 82 S.Ct. 691 , 7 L.Ed.2d 663 (1962); see also Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 , 84 S.Ct. 1362 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964) and Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 , 83 S.Ct. 801 , 9 L.Ed.2d 821 (1963), that “a fairly apportioned legislature lies at the very heart of representative democracy.” As such, it is imperative that the rights of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Legislative Redistricting Cases
(2×)
See also Hughes v. Maryland Committee, 241 Md. 471, 498-509 , 217 A.2d 273, 289-295 , cert. denied, 384 U.S. 950 , 86 S.Ct. 1569 , 16 L.Ed.2d 547 (1966) (Barnes, J., dissenting) (discussing at length the importance of the political subdivisions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Legislative Districting of the State
(2×)
See Maryland, Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes, supra, 229 Md. at 411-12, 184 A.2d at 717-18; see also Hughes v. Maryland Committee, 241 Md. 471, 498-509 , 217 A.2d 273, 289-295 (Barnes, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 950 , 86 S.Ct. 1569 , 16 L.Ed.2d 547 (1966); see generally Matthew P. Andrews, History of Maryland 617 (1929) (“In the matter of representation Maryland has been likened to a ‘confederacy of counties,’ or a federated republic — the counties and the city of Baltimore ... being comparable to the states in the Federal Union”); Theodore J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Freeman v. Hammond Corp.
See, e. g., Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Methode Electronics, Inc., 356 F.2d 442, 447-448 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 950 , 86 S.Ct. 1570 , 16 L.Ed.2d 547 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Terrebonne Parish School Board
v.
Texaco Inc.
v.
Texaco Inc.
No. 1133.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1966.
Lloyd J. Cobb, Mettery I. Sherry, Jr., and Herbert W. Christenberry, Jr., for petitioners. Paul F. Schlicher for Texaco Inc.; Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and John L. Madden, Edward M. Carmouche and John A. Bivins for the State of Louisiana et al., respondents.
Published
Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.