Hoffa v. United States, 386 U.S. 940 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Hoffa v. United States, 386 U.S. 940 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
134 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 46 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: MCCRAY, WENFORD N., PEOPLE v (nyappdiv, 2012-06-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" MCCRAY, WENFORD N., PEOPLE v
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
“There is no constitutional right to be -2- 749 KA 11-01022 arrested and the police are not required to stop their investigation at the first indication that they may have probable cause in order to effect an arrest” (People v Keller, 148 AD2d 958, 960 , lv denied 73 NY2d 1017 ; see Hoffa v United States, 385 US 293, 310 , reh denied 386 US 940 ; People v Ahmed, 72 AD3d 502, 505 , lv denied 15 NY3d 801 ).
discussed Cited "see" People v. McCray
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
“There is no constitutional right to be arrested and the police are not required to stop their investigation at the first indication that they may have probable cause in order to effect an arrest” (People v Keller, 148 AD2d 958, 960 [1989], lv denied 73 NY2d 1017 [1989]; see Hoffa v United States, 385 US 293, 310 [1966], reh denied 386 US 940 [1966]; People v Ahmed, 72 AD3d 502, 505 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 801 [2010]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. McCray
N.Y. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
“There is no constitutional right to be arrested and the police are not required to stop their investigation at the first indication that they may have probable cause in order to effect an arrest” (People v Keller, 148 AD2d 958, 960 [1989], lv denied 73 NY2d 1017 [1989]; see Hoffa v United States, 385 US 293, 310 [1966], reh denied 386 US 940 [1966]; People v Ahmed, 72 AD3d 502, 505 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 801 [2010]).
cited Cited "see" State v. Woods
S.D. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966) reh den., 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Anderson (2×)
Utah · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725 (2nd Cir. 1966), cert. granted, 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 , cert. dismissed, 389 U.S. 80 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , reh. denied, 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 583 , 19 L.Ed.2d 675 (1967).
cited Cited "see" State v. Gilbert
S.C. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hoffa v. United States , 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed. (2d) 374, reh. den . 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed. (2d) 880 (1966).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Petition to Compel Testimony of Tuso
N.J. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 730 (2 Cir.1966), cert. granted 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 872 (1967), dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 255 , reh. den. 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 583 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 675 (1967); United States v. Payton, 363 F. 2d 996, 999-1000 (2 Cir.1966) (Friendly, J., dissenting); United States v. Arcuri, 282 F. Supp. 347, 349 (E.D.N.Y. 1968), aff'd 405 F. 2d 691 (2 Cir.1968), cert. den. 395 U.S. 913 , 89 S.Ct. 1760 , 23 L.Ed. 2d 227 (1969) (holding that an indictment based solely on hearsay evidence would be …
cited Cited "see" In re the Petition to Compel Testimony of Tuso
N.J. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. granted 386 U. S. 940 , 87 S. Ct. 975 , 17 L.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Schiavo
E.D. Pa. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20, 43 (6th Cir. 1965), aff’d, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), rehearing denied, 386 U.S. 940 , 951, 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Nelson Cruz
5th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1966) (dicta), cert. granted, *411 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 , cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967); United States v. Malofsky, 388 F.2d 288 (2d Cir.) (dicta), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1017 , 88 S.Ct. 1273 , 20 L.Ed.2d 168 (1968), United States v. Leibowitz, 420 F.2d 39, 41-42 (2d Cir. 1969), 3 However, this “best evidence” rule has never been considered, even by that circuit, as a constitutional requirement.
cited Cited "see" Hoffa v. United States
E.D. Tenn. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 , affirmed 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), reh. den. 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967).
discussed Cited "see" United States Ex Rel. Dessus v. Commonwealth of Pa.
E.D. Pa. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 (6th Cir. 1965), aff’d, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), reh. denied, 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967) and 386 U.S. 951 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967); Estes v. United States, 335 F.2d 609 (5th Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 964 , 85 S.Ct. 656 , 13 L.Ed.2d 559 (1965), reh. denied, 380 U.S. 926 , 85 S.Ct. 884 , 13 L.Ed.2d 814 (1965); United States v. Knowles, supra; Commonwealth v. Dessus, 214 Pa.Super. 347 , 257 A.2d 867 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" Joel Rubin v. United States
5th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
Perez v. United States, 297 F.2d 12, 14-15 (5th Cir. 1961); see United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20, 51 (6th Cir. 1965), affirmed, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), reh. denied, 386 U.S. 940 , 951, 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967); Levine v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 281 , 261 F.2d 747 (1958), cf., Cortez v. United States, 328 F.2d 51 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 848 , 85 S.Ct. 89 , 13 L.Ed.2d 52 (1964); Beck v. United States, 317 F.2d 865 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 972 , 84 S.Ct. 480 , 11 L.Ed.2d 419 , reh. denied, 376 U.S. 929 , 84 S.Ct. 656 , …
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Richard Beltram and Andres Colon (2×)
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert, granted, 386 U.S. 940 [ 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 ] (1967) [cert, dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (U.S., Nov. 6, 1967)]; United States v. Payton, 363 F.2d 996, 999 (2 Cir.), cert, denied, 385 U.S. 993 , [ 87 S.Ct. 606 , 17 L.Ed.2d 453 ] (1966).” United States v. Andrews, 381 F.2d 377 (2d Cir. 1967).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Robert Andrews, A/K/A Robert Turqe
2d Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert, granted, 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 (1967); United States v. Payton, 363 F.2d 996, 999 (2 Cir.), cert, denied, 385 U.S. 993 , 87 S.Ct. 606 , 17 L.Ed.2d 453 (1966).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Garrow
Iowa · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206 , 87 S.Ct. 424 , 17 L.Ed.2d 312 (1966), reh. den., 386 U.S. 939 , 87 S.Ct. 951 , 17 L.Ed.2d 811 (1967); see also Hoffa v. *258 United States, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), reh. den., 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 971, 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967) (no fourth amendment interest involved where defendant made incriminating statements in presence of civilian informer who was in defendant’s presence by invitation); State v. Ahart, 324 N.W.2d 317, 319 (Iowa 1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James v. Goldberg (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451, 453 , 69 S.Ct. 191 , 93 L.Ed. 153 (1948); see also Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), rehearing denied, 386 U.S. 940 , 951, 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967); Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206 , 87 S.Ct. 424 , 17 L.Ed.2d 312 (1966), rehearing denied, 386 U.S. 939 , 87 S.Ct. 951 , 17 L.Ed.2d 811 (1967).
Hoffa
v.
United States Parks v. United States Campbell v. United States and King v. United States
No. 32; No. 33; No. 34; No. 35.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 27, 1967.
386 U.S. 940
Leonard B. Boudin for Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association, as amicus curiae, in support of motion to vacate judgment. Morris A. Shenker, Daniel B. Maher and Joseph A. Fanelli for petitioner in No. 32, Jacques M. Schifjer for petitioner in No. 33, Cecil D. Branstetter for petitioner in No. 34, and P. D. Maktos and Harold E. Brown for petitioner in No. 35 on the motion to vacate judgment. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in all four cases in opposition to the motion to vacate judgment.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 6th Cir. (Decided 385 U. S. 293; rehearing denied, post, p. 951.)

Motion of Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Motion to. vacate judgment deniéd. Mr. Justice White and Mr. . Justice Fortas took ho part in the consideration or decision of these motions.