How cited: Hoffa v. United States · Go Syfert

Hoffa v. United States (1967)

green · 134 citation events across 46 courts. Showing the 17 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196619962026
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. granted, 386 U.S. 940 ( 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 ) (1967) (cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (U.S., Nov. 6, 1967)) ; United States v. Payton, 363 F.2d 996, 999 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 993 , ( 87 S.Ct. 606 , 17 L.Ed.2d 453 ) (1966).' United States v. Andrews, 381 F.2d 377 (2d Cir. 1967). 14 The indictment in the present case was returned before …
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1966) (dicta), cert. granted, *411 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 , cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967); United States v. Malofsky, 388 F.2d 288 (2d Cir.) (dicta), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1017 , 88 S.Ct. 1273 , 20 L.Ed.2d 168 (1968), United States v. Leibowitz, 420 F.2d 39, 41-42 (2d Cir. 1969), 3 However, this “best evidence” rule has never been considered…
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
Perez v. United States, 297 F.2d 12, 14-15 (5th Cir. 1961); see United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20, 51 (6th Cir. 1965), affirmed, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), reh. denied, 386 U.S. 940 , 951, 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967); Levine v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 281 , 261 F.2d 747 (1958), cf., Cortez v. United States, 328 F.2d 51 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 848 , 85 S.Ct. 89 , 13 L.Ed.2d 52 (1964); Beck v. United States, 317 F.2d 865
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert, granted, 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 (1967); United States v. Payton, 363 F.2d 996, 999 (2 Cir.), cert, denied, 385 U.S. 993 , 87 S.Ct. 606 , 17 L.Ed.2d 453 (1966).
green State v. Anderson (1980)
Cited · Utah · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Umans, 368 F.2d 725 (2nd Cir.1966), cert. granted, 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed.2d 872 , cert. dismissed, 389 U.S. 80 , 19 L.Ed.2d 255 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , reh. denied, 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 583 , 19 L.Ed.2d 675 (1967).
green James v. Goldberg (1969)
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451, 453 , 69 S.Ct. 191 , 93 L.Ed. 153 (1948); see also Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), rehearing denied, 386 U.S. 940 , 951, 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967); Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206 , 87 S.Ct. 424 , 17 L.Ed.2d 312 (1966), rehearing denied, 386 U.S. 939 , 87 S.Ct. 951 , 17 L.Ed.2d 811 (1967).
Cited · N.Y. App. Div. · signal: see
“There is no constitutional right to be -2- 749 KA 11-01022 arrested and the police are not required to stop their investigation at the first indication that they may have probable cause in order to effect an arrest” (People v Keller, 148 AD2d 958, 960 , lv denied 73 NY2d 1017 ; see Hoffa v United States, 385 US 293, 310 , reh denied 386 US 940 ; People v Ahmed, 72 AD3d 502, 505 , lv denied 15 NY3d 801 ).
green People v. McCray (2012)
Cited · N.Y. App. Div. · signal: see
“There is no constitutional right to be arrested and the police are not required to stop their investigation at the first indication that they may have probable cause in order to effect an arrest” (People v Keller, 148 AD2d 958, 960 [1989], lv denied 73 NY2d 1017 [1989]; see Hoffa v United States, 385 US 293, 310 [1966], reh denied 386 US 940 [1966]; People v Ahmed, 72 AD3d 502, 505 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 801 [2010]).
green People v. McCray (2012)
Cited · N.Y. App. Div. · signal: see
“There is no constitutional right to be arrested and the police are not required to stop their investigation at the first indication that they may have probable cause in order to effect an arrest” (People v Keller, 148 AD2d 958, 960 [1989], lv denied 73 NY2d 1017 [1989]; see Hoffa v United States, 385 US 293, 310 [1966], reh denied 386 US 940 [1966]; People v Ahmed, 72 AD3d 502, 505 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 801 [2010]).
green State v. Garrow (1992)
Cited (see also) · Iowa · signal: see also
Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206 , 87 S.Ct. 424 , 17 L.Ed.2d 312 (1966), reh. den., 386 U.S. 939 , 87 S.Ct. 951 , 17 L.Ed.2d 811 (1967); see also Hoffa v. *258 United States, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), reh. den., 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 971, 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967) (no fourth amendment interest involved where defendant made incriminating statements in presence of civilian informer who was in defendant’s presence by invitation); State v. Ahar…
green State v. Woods (1985)
Cited · S.D. · signal: see
See, Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966) reh den., 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967).
green State v. Gilbert (1979)
Cited · S.C. · signal: see
See Hoffa v. United States , 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed. (2d) 374, reh. den . 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed. (2d) 880 (1966).
Cited · N.J. · signal: see
See United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 730 (2 Cir.1966), cert. granted 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 975 , 17 L.Ed. 2d 872 (1967), dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80 , 88 S.Ct. 253 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 255 , reh. den. 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 583 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 675 (1967); United States v. Payton, 363 F. 2d 996, 999-1000 (2 Cir.1966) (Friendly, J., dissenting); United States v. Arcuri, 282 F. Supp. 347, 349 (E.D.N.Y. 1968), aff'd 405 F. 2d 691 (2 Cir.1968), cert. den. 395…
Cited · N.J. · signal: see
See United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. granted 386 U. S. 940 , 87 S. Ct. 975 , 17 L.
Friendly, J., dissenting
Cited · E.D. Pa. · signal: see
See United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20, 43 (6th Cir. 1965), aff’d, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), rehearing denied, 386 U.S. 940 , 951, 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967).
green Hoffa v. United States (1972)
Cited · E.D. Tenn. · signal: see
See United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 , affirmed 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), reh. den. 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967).
Cited · E.D. Pa. · signal: see
See United States v. Hoffa, 349 F.2d 20 (6th Cir. 1965), aff’d, 385 U.S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 408 , 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966), reh. denied, 386 U.S. 940 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967) and 386 U.S. 951 , 87 S.Ct. 970 , 17 L.Ed.2d 880 (1967); Estes v. United States, 335 F.2d 609 (5th Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 964 , 85 S.Ct. 656 , 13 L.Ed.2d 559 (1965), reh. denied, 380 U.S. 926 , 85 S.Ct. 884 , 13 L.Ed.2d 814 (1965); United States v. Knowles, supra; Commonwealth v. Dess…