green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
6.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1993 ·
…the government cannot make a binding contract that it will not exercise a sovereign power, but it can agree in a contract that if it does so, it will pay the other contracting party the amount by which its costs are increased by the sovereign act.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Winstar Corp. v. United States
the government cannot make a binding contract that it -will not exercise a sovereign power, but it can agree in a contract that if it does so, it will pay the other contracting party the amount by which its costs are increased by the sovereign act.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Winstar Corporation v. United States
the government cannot make a binding contract that it will not exercise a sovereign power, but it can agree in a contract that if it does so, it will pay the other contracting party the amount by which its costs are increased by the sovereign act.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Winstar Corp. v. United States
the government cannot make a binding contract that it will not exercise a sovereign power, but it can agree in a contract that if it does so, it will pay the other contracting party the amount by which its costs are increased by the sovereign act.
cited
Cited "see"
Everett Plywood Corp. v. United States
See Amino Brothers Co. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 515 , 372 F.2d 485 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 846 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carpenters Union Local No. 25, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Los Angeles County District Council of Carpenters, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Afl-Cio & Carpenters Union Local No. 2435, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Afl-Cio
See, e.g., NLRB v. Int'l Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union, Local 12, 378 F.2d 125, 129 (9th Cir.) (section 8(b)(2) violated by "simple expedient" of not dispatching men), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 846 , 88 S.Ct. 104 , 19 L.Ed.2d 113 (1967); NLRB v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 12, 237 F.2d 670, 674 (9th Cir.1956) (implicitly rejecting dissent's argument that section 8(b)(2) requires that the employer have knowledge of union's unlawful activity), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 910 , 77 S.Ct. 666 , 1 L.Ed.2d 664 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carpenters Union Local No. 25 v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e.g., NLRB v. Int’l Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, Local 12, 378 F.2d 125, 129 (9th Cir.) (section 8(b)(2) violated by “simple expedient” of not dispatching men), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 846 , 88 S.Ct. 104 , 19 L.Ed.2d 113 (1967); NLRB v. Int’l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 12, 237 F.2d 670, 674 (9th Cir.1956) (implicitly rejecting dissent’s argument that section 8(b)(2) requires that the employer have knowledge of union’s unlawful activity), ce rt. denied, 353 U.S. 910 , 77 S.Ct. 666 , 1 L.Ed.2d 664 (1957).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Amino Brothers Co., Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 411.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
John A. Bier smith for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (3)
Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.