green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Elder v. Rampton
See, Zwickler v. Koota, supra, at 250 of 389 U.S., 88 S.Ct. 391; Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 378 , 84 S.Ct. 1316 , 12 L.Ed.2d 377 (1964) (both cases applying the test of ready rehabilitation to absention questions).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal R. Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
539.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1967.
389 U.S. 88
Published
BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERMINAL R. CO. et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
No. 539.
Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1967.
November 6, 1967
John H. Gobel, for appellants.
Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt, for appellees United States and others.
Don McDevitt, for appellees Atchison, T. & S. F. and others.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motions to affirm the granted and the judgment is affirmed.