green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Quinton B. McNew v. People's Bank of Ewing, Jane Hayes
See United States v. Milton, 382 F.2d 976, 978 (6th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 952 (1968). 18 While we may sympathize with plaintiff's loss, under the circumstances of this case, the law does not impose a duty upon People's Bank to assume the risk of plaintiff's ill-advised dealings with Hayes, particularly in light of the fact that the bank was not informed of Hayes' fraud until after it had accepted the Florida check. 3 The dismissal of the negligence claim therefore must be affirmed. 19 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carpenters & Joiners Welfare Fund v. Peter Dukinfield Co.
(2×)
See Wagor v. Cal Kovens Construction Corp., 382 F.2d 813, 815 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 952 , 88 S.Ct. 1044 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1145 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Wagner v. United States
I.R.C. § 7422; see Delman v. Commissioner, 384 F.2d 929, 934 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 952 , 88 S.Ct. 1044 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1144 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Butler v. District Director of Internal Revenue
See Delman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 3 Cir., 1967, 384 F.2d 929, 932 , cert. denied, 390 U.S. 952 , 88 S.Ct. 1044 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1144 (1968).” 4.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frieling v. Commissioner
(2×)
See also Delman v. Commissioner, 384 F.2d 929, 932 (3d Cir. 1967), affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court, cert. denied 390 U.S. 952 (1968), where the court concluded that this legislative history showed that sec. 6212(b)(1) was enacted to protect the Secretary and was not a "sword to be used by the taxpayer.” See, e.g., DeWelles v. United States, 378 F.2d 37, 39 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 996 (1967); Keeton v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 377, 381 (1980); Estate of McKaig v. Commissioner, 51 T.C. 331, 336 (1968); Heaberlin v. Commissioner, 34 T.C. 58, 59 (1960); Foster v. Commissione…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Estes
v.
Camden Fire Insurance Association of General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp., Ltd.
v.
Camden Fire Insurance Association of General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp., Ltd.
No. 994.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 1968.
Edward J. Utz for Camden Fire Insurance Assn, of General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp., Ltd., Robert M. Dennis for State Automobile Mutual Insurance Co., Ambrose H. Lindhorst for Gusweiler, William B. Saxbe, Attorney General, James D. Newcomer, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles S. Lopeman for the State of Ohio, and Solicitor General Griswold for the United States, respondents.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.