green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.3 score
“ther courts in applying the law of the case rule have held that a lower court is not bound to follow the mandate of an appellate court if the mandate is, in the interim, affected by an authority superior to the court issuing the mandate”
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wilson v. Great American Industries, Inc.
ther courts in applying the law of the case rule have held that a lower court is not bound to follow the mandate of an appellate court if the mandate is, in the interim, affected by an authority superior to the court issuing the mandate
cited
Cited "see"
DeFrancis v. Bush
See Nowell v. Nowell, 384 F.2d 951 (5th Cir.1967), ce rt. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1150 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See Home-Stake Production Co, C.A. v. Talon ___ _____________________________ _____ Petroleum, 907 F.2d 1012, 1017 (10th Cir. 1990). _________ Where, as the court supportably found in the instant case, a defendant has received actual notice of an action, service of process requirements are to be "broadly interpreted," see, e.g., Nowell v. Nowell, 384 F.2d 951 (5th ___ ___ ______ ______ Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 (1968); Adams v. ____ ______ _____ School Board, 53 F.R.D. 267, 268 (D.Pa. 1971), and ______________ "substantial compliance" with the requirements suffices, see ___ Precis…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See Home-Stake Production Co, C.A. v. Talon Petroleum, 907 F.2d 1012, 1017 (10th Cir. 1990). 12 Where, as the court supportably found in the instant case, a defendant has received actual notice of an action, service of process requirements are to be "broadly interpreted," see, e.g., Nowell v. Nowell, 384 F.2d 951 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 (1968); Adams v. School Board, 53 F.R.D. 267, 268 (D.Pa. 1971), and "substantial compliance" with the requirements suffices, see Precision Etchings, 953 F.2d at 24 (citing cases).
cited
Cited "see"
Estate of Cooper by and Through Cooper v. Leamer
See Nowell v. Nowell, 384 F.2d 951 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1150 (1968); In Re Paolino, 49 B.R. 834 (Bankr.E.D.Pa. 1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corp.
See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 F.2d 166, 178 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1038 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1968). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Keevan & Son, Inc. v. Callier Steel Pipe & Tube, Inc.
See Nowell v. Nowell, 384 F.2d 951 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1150 (1968) (when defendant had actual notice of lawsuit, service of process left with defendant’s apartment complex manager who resided in a different building than the defendant was effective); Karlsson v. Rabinowitz, 318 F.2d 666 (4th Cir.1963) (service of process left at defendant’s former residence was effective because defendant had actual knowledge of the suit).
discussed
Cited "see"
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Rapton
Finance Corporation, supra; see Nowell v. Nowell, 384 F.2d 951 , 32 A.L.R.3d 107 (5th Cir.1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1150 (1968) (applied to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(d)(1)); Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Turner, 50 F.R.D. 144 (D.Ariz.1970) (applied to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(d)(1)).
cited
Cited "see"
Maine Milk Commission v. Chandler
See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 F.2d 166 (2nd Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1038 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Pitchford Scientific Instruments Corp. v. Pepi, Inc.
See Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 383 F.2d 166 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1038 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Woods v. State
See Givens v. State, 243 Ark. 16 , 418 S.W. 2d 629 (1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 956 (1968), where the facts supporting the motion were decidedly more favorable to the accused than they are here.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. William Epton v. Albert Nenna, Warden, Manhattan House of Detention for Men
Briggs v. Pennsylvania R.R., 334 U.S. 304 , 68 S.Ct. 1039 , 92 L.Ed. 1403 (1948); Ex Parte Sibbald v. United States, 12 Pet. 488 , 37 U.S. 488 , 9 L.Ed. 1167 (1838); see Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 *366 F.2d 166, 177-178 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1038 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Desalvo v. Clarity Services, Inc.
See, e.g., Nowell 15 v. Nowell, 384 F.2d 951 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1053 , 16 19 L.Ed.2d 1150 (1968); Karlsson v. Rabinowitz, 318 F.2d 666 (4th Cir. 1963); 17 Rovinski v. Rowe, 131 F.2d 687 (6th Cir. 1942); Insurance Co. of North America v. 18 S/S "Hellenic Challenger", 88 F.R.D. 545 (S.D.N.Y. 1980); Nichols v. Surgitool, 19 Inc., 419 F. Supp. 58 (W.D.N.Y. 1976); Blackhawk Heating Plumbing Co. v. Turner, 20 50 F.R.D. 144 (D.Ariz. 1970); Adams Dairy Co. v. National Dairy Products Corp., 21 293 F. Supp. 1164 (W.D.Mo. 1968); Hysell v. Murray, 28 F.R.D. 584 (D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New England Insurance Company v. Healthcare Underwriters Mutual Insurance Company
But a mandate is controlling only "as to matters within its compass...." Sprague v. Ticonic Nat'l Bank, 307 U.S. 161, 168 , 59 S.Ct. 777 , 83 L.Ed. 1184 (1939); see also Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 F.2d 166, 178 (2d Cir.1967) (declining to extend the Supreme Court mandate rule to cover situations in which an intervening statute changes the law after the Supreme Court issues its mandate, but noting that "[o]f course [the mandate rule] does not apply to matters left open by the mandate" (citing Sprague )), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1038 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New England Insurance v. Healthcare Underwriters Mutual Insurance
But a- mandate is controlling only “as to matters within its compass.... ” Sprague v. Ticonic Nat’l Bank, 307 U.S. 161, 168 , 59 S.Ct. 777 , 83 L.Ed. 1184 (1939); see also Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 F.2d 166, 178 (2d Cir.1967) (declining to extend the Supreme Court mandate rule to cover situations in which an intervening statute changes the law after the Supreme Court issues its mandate, but noting that “[o]f course [the mandate rule] does not apply to matters left open by the mandate” (citing Sprague)), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1038 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stephen Borzeka v. Margaret O. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
See, e.g., Nowell v. Nowell, 384 F.2d 951 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1150 (1968); Karlsson v. Rabinowitz, 318 F.2d 666 (4th Cir.1963); Rovinski v. Rowe, 131 F.2d 687 (6th Cir. 1942); Insurance Co. of North America v. S/S “Hellenic Challenger”, 88 F.R.D. 545 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Nichols v. Surgitool, Inc., 419 F.Supp. 58 (W.D.N.Y.1976); Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co. v. Turner, 50 F.R.D. 144 (D.Ariz.1970); Adams Dairy Co. v. National Dairy Products Corp., 293 F.Supp. 1164 (W.D.Mo.1968); Hysell v. Murray, 28 F.R.D. 584 (D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank
"The major underpinning of the act of state doctrine is the policy of foreclosing court adjudications involving the legality of acts of foreign states on their own soil that might embarrass the Executive Branch of our Government in the conduct of our foreign relations." Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682, 697 , 96 S.Ct. 1854, 1862 , 48 L.Ed.2d 301 (1976) (plurality opinion) (citing Sabbatino, 376 U.S. at 427-28, 431-33 , 84 S.Ct. at 941-42 ); see also Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 F.2d 166, 180 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1038 , 19 L…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
“The major underpinning of the act of state doctrine is the policy of foreclosing court adjudications involving the legality of acts of foreign states on their own soil that might embarrass the Executive Branch of our Government in the conduct of our foreign relations.” Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682, 697 , 96 S.Ct. 1854, 1862 , 48 L.Ed.2d 301 (1976) (plurality opinion) (citing Sabbatino, 376 U.S. at 427-28, 431-33 , 84 S.Ct. at 941-42 ); see also Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 F.2d 166, 180 (2d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1038 , …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Elmer Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
See also Banco *533 Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 383 F.2d 166, 179 (2d Cir. 1967), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 5.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Lincoln Plaza Towers Associates
Compare Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Farr, 243 F.Supp. 957, 964 (S.D.N.Y.1965), aff’d 383 F.2d 166 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1038 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Francis Curry, Jr.
Compare Sicurella v. United States, 348 U.S. 385 , 75 S.Ct. 403 , 99 L.Ed. 436 (1955) with United States v. Spiro, 384 F.2d 159 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 956 , 88 S.Ct. 1028 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gay
v.
City of Orlando
v.
City of Orlando
No. 1042.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 1968.
J. Russell Hornsby for petitioner. Norman Burke for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: N.D. New York (1)
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 4th Dist. Certiorari denied.