green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Pulley v. State
Stump v. Bennett, 398 F. 2d 111 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U. S. 1001 *690 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
McElvain v. Lewis
See People v. Ragen, 262 Cal.App.2d 392, 398 , 68 Cal. Rptr. 700 (1968) (police conduct in having rape victim telephone perpetrator and accuse him of crime did not overbear perpetrator’s will to resist where he could have hung up at any time), cert, denied sub nom., Ragen v. California, 393 U.S. 1000 , 89 S.Ct. 489 , 21 L.Ed.2d 465 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Gelvin
Accord, Piqua v. Hinger, 15 Ohio St. 2d 110 , 238 N.E.2d 766, 767-68 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1001 , 21 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Adkins v. Bordenkircher
See, Stump v. Bennett, 398 F.2d 111, 115 (8th Cir. 1968) (En Banc), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1001 , 89 S.Ct. 483 , 21 L.Ed.2d 466 (1968); Graham v. Maryland, 454 F.Supp. 643, 650 (D.Md. 1978); Robertson v. Warden, Maryland Peni *399 tentiary, 466 F.Supp. 262, 264 (D.Md.1979), affd, on other grounds in an unpublished opinion, 624 F.2d 1095 ; Rogers v. Redman, 457 F.Supp. 929, 932 (D.Del.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Means v. Solem
Jackson v. Virginia, - U.S. -, -, 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); see a iso Stump v. Bennett, 398 F.2d 111 , 117 n. 5 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 1001 , 89 S.Ct. 483 , 21 L.Ed.2d 466 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Prouty
See Stump v. Bennett, 398 F.2d 111 (8 Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1001 , 89 S.Ct. 483 , 21 L.Ed.2d 466 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Thomas
(2×)
See Johnson v. Bennett, 414 F.2d 50 (8 Cir. 1969) and Stump v. Bennett, 398 F.2d 111 (8 Cir. 1968), cert. den., 393 U.S. 1001 , 89 S.Ct. 483 , 21 L.Ed.2d 466 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hutton
(2×)
See Stump v. Bennett, 398 F.2d 111 (8 Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1001 , 89 S.Ct. 483 , 21 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Crosby v. State of Delaware
See Stump v. Bennett, 398 F.2d 111 (C.A.8, 1968), cert. den. 393 U.S. 1001 , 89 S.Ct. 483 , 21 L.Ed.2d 466 (1968); United States v. Marcus, 166 F.2d 497 (C.A.3, 1948). 4 Other defenses which are properly classifiable as affirmative defenses are self-defense, duress, insanity, intoxication and entrapment. 5 When each of these defenses are asserted, the person charged admits committing the offense, but offers an excuse and justification for his actions.
cited
Cited "see"
Ellhamer v. Wilson
See Stump v. Bennett, 398 F.2d 111 (8th Cir.) cert. denied 393 U.S. 1001 , 89 S.Ct. 483 , 21 L.Ed.2d 466 (1968); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. Smith
See also Stump v. Bennett, 398 F.2d 111 , 116 et seq. (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1001 , 89 S.Ct. 483 , 21 L.Ed.2d 466 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
See also Stump v. Bennett, 398, F.2d 111 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1001 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Younger, District Attorney of County of Los Angeles
v.
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (Sirhan, real party in interest)
v.
Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (Sirhan, real party in interest)
No. 687.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1968.
Evelle J. Younger, petitioner, pro se. Joseph A. Ball for respondent.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied..