Capt. Dale E. Noyd v. Maj. Gen. Charles R. Bond, Jr., 393 U.S. 1048 (1969). · Go Syfert
Search
Capt. Dale E. Noyd v. Maj. Gen. Charles R. Bond, Jr., 393 U.S. 1048 (1969). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “The member must first exhaust the available internal union remedies, or show an adequate reason for failing to do so.”
156 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 41 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nanney v. Chrysler Corp. (ded, 1984-12-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Nanney v. Chrysler Corp.
D. Del. · 1984 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the member must first exhaust the available internal union remedies, or show an adequate reason for failing to do so.
cited Cited "see" Brotherhood Railway Carmen of United States v. Delpro Co.
D. Del. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 196 F.Supp. 504 (D.Del.1961), aff'd on later appeal, 401 F.2d 87 (3d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 684 , 21 L.Ed.2d 691 (1969).
cited Cited "see" Varra v. Dillon Companies, Inc.
10th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 401 F.2d 87, 104 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 680 , 21 L.Ed.2d 691 (1969).
cited Cited "see" Varra v. Dillon Companies
10th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 401 F.2d 87, 104 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 680 , 21 L.Ed.2d 691 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" Terrence J. Harrison v. Chrysler Corporation (2×)
7th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 401 F.2d 87 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 680 , 21 L.Ed.2d 691 (1969).
cited Cited "see" Rosa M. Figueroa De Arroyo v. Sindicato De Trabajadores Packinghouse, Afl-Cio, and Puerto Rico Telephone Company
1st Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 401 F.2d 87, 94 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, International Ass’n of Machinists v. Brady, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 680 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 691 (1969). 2 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Caputo v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers
E.D.N.Y · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Brady v. TWA, 196 F.Supp. 504 (D.Del.1961), aff'd., 401 F.2d 87 (3d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 680 , 21 L.Ed.2d 691 (1969), Nedd v. Thomas, 316 F.Supp. 74 (M.D.Pa.1970), Acheson v. Bottlers Local Union No. 896, 83 L.R.R.M. 2845 (N.D.Cal.1973), Harrison v. Chrysler, 60 F.R.D. 9 (S.D.Ind.1973) and Atwood v. Pacific Maritime Association, 432 F.Supp. 491 (D.Or.1977), aff 'd, 657 F.2d 1055 (9th Cir.1981), denying jury trial for fair representation claims; Minnis v. Int’l Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, U.A.W., et …
cited Cited "see, e.g." Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Association of Flight Attendants
S.D. Tex. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Brady v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 223 F.Supp. 361, 367 (D.Del.1963), aff’d, 401 F.2d 87 (3rd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 680 , 21 L.Ed.2d 691 (1969).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Griesemer v. Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1393
E.D. Pa. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., 424 U.S. 554, 564 , 96 S.Ct. 1048 , 47 L.Ed.2d 231 (1976), Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization, 420 U.S. 50, 64 , 95 S.Ct. 977 , 43 L.Ed.2d 12 (1975), National Labor Relations Board v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee, 415 U.S. 322, 325 , 94 S.Ct. 1099 , 39 L.Ed.2d 358 (1974), International Association of Machinists v. Street, 367 U.S. 740, 760-61 , 81 S.Ct. 1784 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1141 (1961), Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman, 345 U.S. 330, 337-38 , 73 S.Ct. 681 , 97 L.Ed. 1048 (1953), Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 76…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Geddes v. Chrysler Corporation
6th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Brady v. Trans World Airlines, 223 F.Supp. 361 (D.Del.1963), Aff'd, 401 F.2d 87 (3rd Cir. 1968), Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 680 , 21 L.Ed.2d 691 (1969).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Geddes v. Chrysler Corp.
6th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Brady v. Trans World Airlines, 223 F.Supp. 361 (D.Del.1963), aff’d, 401 F.2d 87 (3rd Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 680 , 21 L.Ed.2d 691 (1969).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James W. Chambers v. Local Union No. 639, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
D.C. Cir. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Brady v. Trans World Airlines, 223 F.Supp. 361 (D.C.Del.1963), aff'd 401 F.2d 87 (3d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 680 , 21 L.Ed.2d 691 (1969) 20 Fredrickson v. System Federation No. 114 of Railway Employment Dept., AFL-CIO, 436 F.2d 764 (9th Cir. 1970); Yeager v. C.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Craycroft v. Ferrall
9th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Noyd v. Bond, 402 F.2d 441 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. granted, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 692 , 21 L.Ed.2d 690 (Jan. 20, 1969) ; United States ex rel.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Peter Craycroft v. William E. Ferrall, Commandant, Thirteenth Naval District, Robert Strange McNamara as Secretary of Defense, and Robert H. v. Baldwin, as Acting Secretary of the Navy, or His Successor as Acting Secretary, or as Secretary of the Navy, Peter Craycroft v. Clark Clifford, Secretary of Defense, Paul Robert Ignatius, Secretary of the Navy, and H. J. Trum, Commandant, Thirteenth Naval District
9th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Noyd v. Bond, 402 F.2d 441 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. granted, 393 U.S. 1048 , 89 S.Ct. 692 , 21 L.Ed.2d 690 (Jan. 20, 1969); United States ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Capt. Dale E. Noyd
v.
Maj. Gen. Charles R. Bond, Jr.
830.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1969.
393 U.S. 1048
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: D. Delaware (1)

393 U.S. 1048

89 S.Ct. 478

21 L.Ed.2d 554

Capt. Dale E. NOYD
v.
Maj. Gen. Charles R. BOND, Jr., et al.

No. 830.

Dec. 24, 1968.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS.

1

Petitioner, incarcerated as a result of a court martial, has filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals denying him standing to challenge the place and manner of his incarceration[1] prior to final review of his conviction because he had not exhausted all of his military remedies. Unlike Gusik v. Schilder, 340 U.S., 128, 71 S.Ct. 149, 95 L.Ed. 146, this habeas corpus proceeding in the federal courts does not challenge purported error in a court martial trial prior to exhaustion of military remedies. Rather the question is whether the doctrine of exhaustion of military remedies applies where the question is whether the court martial authority acts outside its jurisdiction. Cf. United States ex rel. Guagliardo v. McElroy, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 112, 259 F.2d 927, 929, aff'd 361 U.S. 281, 80 S.Ct. 305, 4 L.Ed.2d 282. That question seems to be one of first impression.

2

The question seems to me to be a substantial one on which the full Court should pass, which it will not be able to do until January 10, 1969.[2] I therefore have concluded that until the Court is able to pass on the petition for writ of certiorari, petitioner should be placed in a non-incarcerated status, which as the District Court said, should prevent his superiors from 'assigning the plaintiff to combat activity or requiring him to perform duties whereby he will be perhaps faced with the necessity of a General Court Martial or other proceedings that might injure him as a practical matter.'

3

The precise terms and conditions may be settled by the District Court.

1

Art. 71(c) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice provides: 'No sentence which includes, unsuspended, a dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge, or confinement for one year or more, may be executed until affirmed by a board of review and, in cases reviewed by it, the Court of Military Appeals.'

2

My Brother White denied this application December 18, 1968; and I would therefore take this present application to the full Court were the members available. But since I feel that a substantial question is presented by the petition for writ of certiorari and since the problem raises a further issue, also unresolved, concerning the scope of review by the Court of Military Appeals and the role reserved for the regular federal courts, I feel that petitioner is entitled to relief pending consideration of the petitio for certiorari January 10, 1969.