green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Finkelstein v. District of Columbia
(2×)
See Rich v. District of Columbia, 410 A.2d 528, 535-36 (D.C. 1979) (citing Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 133 U.S.App.D.C. 110 , 113, 409 F.2d 145, 148 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 (1969), and Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)); see also Brun-Jacobo v. Pan Am.
cited
Cited "see"
Sigal Construction Corp. v. Stanbury
See Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 133 U.S. App.D.C. 110, 112-13, 409 F.2d 145, 147-48 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Vivian L. Fields v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Alfred George Futrell
See Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 409 F.2d 145, 148 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 (1969); Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N. V.
discussed
Cited "see"
Golden State Transit Corporation, Etc. v. City of Los Angeles
It is well settled that a reviewing court “will not strike down an otherwise constitutional statute on the basis of an allegedly illicit legislative motive.” United States v. O’Brien, 391 U.S. 367, 383 , 88 S.Ct. 1673, 1682 , 20 L.Ed.2d 672 (1968); accord, Kalish v. United States, 411 F.2d 606, 607 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 86 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Worthington v. Bynum
See Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 409 F.2d 145 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Shows v. Jamison Bedding, Inc.
See Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., D.C.Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 145, 148 (Wright, J.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 .
cited
Cited "see"
Shows v. Jamison Bedding
See Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., D.C.Cir.1969, 409 F.2d 145, 148 (Wright, J.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Transok Pipeline Company, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Maxwell Darks, Marvin Olivo, Agnes Lucas Now Wesley
See Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 133 U.S.App.D.C. 110 , 409 F.2d 145 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 , where the court said that it would reverse the granting of a new trial for excessive verdict only where the quantum of damages found by the jury was clearly within the maximum limit of a reasonable range.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephen Edynak v. Atlantic Shipping Inc. Cie. Chambon MacLovia S. A. v. Allied Chemical Company, Atlantic Shipping, Inc.
See generally Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 133 U.S.App.D.C. 110 , 409 F.2d 145, 148, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 (1969); Note, Remittitur Practice in the Federal Courts, 76 Colum.L.Rev. 229, 303-04 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecil Robinson
(2×)
The fact that such a case has not arisen is itself indicative of a well-founded reluctance on the part of trial judges twice to tell a lone holdout to listen to other jurors' views "with a disposition to be convinced." When the judge so instructs the lone holdout, "the effect . . . is unavoidably to add the judge's influence to the side of the majority . . . ." with the sole minority juror "develop(ing) a sense of isolation and the impression that (he or she is) the special object of the judge's attention." United States v. Sawyers, 423 F.2d 1335, 1349 (4th Cir. 1970) (Sobeloff, J., dissenting…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Haworth
Accord, Kalish v. United States, 411 F. 2d 606, 607 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 86 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wright
Id., 443 n.6; see also United States v. Meyers, 410 F.2d 693, 697 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S. Ct. 93 , 24 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack Jeffries v. Potomac Development Corporation v. Erwin F. Simon & Associates and Thomas L. Watson, Third-Party
(2×)
See also Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 409 F.2d 145, 147-48 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carl A. Gantt v. Mobil Chemical Company, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Stearns-Roger Corporation, Third Party
See, e. g., Gorsalitz v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corporation, 5 Cir. 1970, 429 F.2d 1033 , citing with approval Taylor *702 v. Washington Terminal Company, 1909, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 110 , 409 F.2d 145 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 : denial by district judge of motion for new trial based upon ex-cessiveness of the verdict will be reviewed only for “abuse of discretion”.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John R. Ryen v. Thomas R. Owens
See, e. g., Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 133 U.S.App.D.C. 110 , 112-113, 409 F.2d 145, 147-148 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 (1969); Rankin v. Shayne Brothers, Inc., 98 U.S.App.D.C. 214 , 234 F.2d 35 (1956); 6A J.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Princemont Construction Corp. v. A. D. Smith
Compare Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 133 U.S.App.D.C. 110 , 409 F.2d 145 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Breen
v.
Otis Elevator Co.
v.
Otis Elevator Co.
No. 309.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1969.
Steven R. Plotkin for petitioner. Charles K. Reasonover for respondents.
Published
Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari denied.