green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Erick Mitchell
See United States v. Battaglia, 410 F.2d 279, 280 (7th Cir.1969), certiorari denied, 396 U.S. 848 , 90 S.Ct. 73 , 24 L.Ed.2d 97 ; United States v. Pope, 409 F.2d 371, 374 (7th Cir.1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Walter Fallen
(2×)
See United States v. Battaglia, 410 F.2d 279, 283 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 848 , 90 S.Ct. 73 , 24 L.Ed.2d 97 (1969). 19 II.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mottola v. Nixon
See United States v. Battaglia, 410 F.2d 279, 284 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 848 , 90 S.Ct. 73 , 24 L.Ed.2d 97 (1969); Ashton v. United States, supra. See also Velvel v. Nixon, 415 F.2d 236 , 238 n. 1 (10th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1042 , 90 S.Ct. 684 , 24 L.Ed.2d 686 (1970). 5 We note that in United States v. Sisson, 294 F.Supp. 511 (D.Mass.1968), the court found that a defendant who had refused induction had standing to challenge the legality of the United States military involvement in Vietnam, even though the same court several years earlier held that a similarly situated…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mottola v. Nixon
See United States v. Battaglia, 410 F.2d 279, 284 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 848 , 90 S.Ct. 73 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 97 (1969); Ashton v. United States, supra. See also Velvel v. Nixon, 415 F.2d 236 , 238 n. 1 (10th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1042 , 90 S.Ct. 684 , 24 L.Ed.2d 686 (1970). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,549 Irwin Popkin v. Warner B. Bishop
See also Levin v. Great Western Sugar Co., 406 F.2d 1112 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 848 , 90 S.Ct. 56 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 97 (1969), a case close on its facts to the present case. 14 . 405 F.2d at 219 -220: In the present ease it is alleged that Aquitaine exercised a controlling influence over the issuance to it of treasury stock of Banff for a wholly in-adequate consideration.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Levin
v.
Great Western Sugar Co.
v.
Great Western Sugar Co.
No. 99.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1969.
Ralph Wien-shienk, Irving Sonnenschein, and Bernard Rothman for petitioners Levin et al. Simon H. Rifkind, William L. Dill, Jr., and Donald B. Kipp for respondents.
Consideration, Douglas, Granted, Should, Took.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.