green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Willson v. Cagle
See Van Houten v. Ralls, 411 F.2d 940 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 436 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Dawson v. Cole
See United States v. Feaster , 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
McDonald v. United States
See Van Houten v. Rails, 411 F.2d 940 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 436 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969); Noga v. United States, 411 F.2d 943 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 841 , 90 S.Ct. 104 , 24 L.Ed.2d 92 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mandel v. United States Department of Health, Education & Welfare
See United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969), which comprehensively described three of the exceptions to the doctrine: (1) where there would be international repercussions resulting from the administrative proceedings, citing McCulloch v. Sociedad Nacional de Marineros de Honduras, 372 U.S. 10 , 83 S.Ct. 671 , 9 L.Ed.2d 547 (1963); (2) where a substantial violation to a plaintiffs constitutional rights has been shown, citing, Fay v. Douds, 172 F.2d 720 (2nd Cir. 1949); and, (3) where an agency acted in “brazen” de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Railway Labor Executives' Association v. National Mediation Board
Carmen, 676 F.2d 960 , 962 (3d Cir.) ("judicial review of NMB decisions concerning its own jurisdictional authority is not barred"), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 989 , 103 S.Ct. 343 , 74 L.Ed.2d 384 (1982); International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. North Carolina Ports Auth., 463 F.2d 1, 3 (4th Cir.) (issue in Switchmen's "was not one of jurisdiction, but of the validity of a Board ruling on a substantial subject clearly within its authorized field"), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 982 , 93 S.Ct. 318 , 34 L.Ed.2d 245 (1972); see also United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354, 1361-62 (5th Cir.) (suggesting that j…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board
Carmen, 676 F.2d 960 , 962 (3d Cir.) (“judicial review of NMB decisions concerning its own jurisdictional authority is not barred”), cert. denied 459 U.S. 989 , 103 S.Ct. 343 , 74 L.Ed.2d 384 (1982); International Longshoremen’s Ass’n v. North Carolina Ports Auth., 463 F.2d 1, 3 (4th Cir.) (issue in Switchmen’s “was not one of jurisdiction, but of the validity of a Board ruling on a substantial subject clearly within its authorized field”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 982 , 93 S.Ct. 318 , 34 L.Ed.2d 245 (1972); see also United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354, 1361-62 (5th Cir.) (sugg…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Air Lines, Inc. v. Airline Division
Compare United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969), with British Airways Board v. National Mediation Board, 685 F.2d 52 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United Air Lines, Inc. v. Airline Division, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Compare United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969), with British Airways Board v. National Mediation Board, 685 F.2d 52 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio v. National Mediation Board
See, e.g., United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969): 25 The Mediation Board, as noted earlier in the opinion, found that the Terminal Railroad was concededly a "carrier" and that the State of Alabama controlled both the Docks Department and the Terminal Railroad.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. National Mediation Board
See, e.g., United States v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969): The Mediation Board, as noted earlier in the opinion, found that the Terminal Railroad was concededly a “carrier” and that the State of Alabama controlled both the Docks Department and the Terminal Railroad.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Mediation Board v. Continental Airlines Corp. (In Re Continental Airlines Corp.)
See also U.S. v. Feaster, 410 F.2d 1354, 1359 (5th Cir.) cert. denied 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 427 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969) (recognizing the RLA’s “statutory command to attain a prompt and orderly settlement of labor disputes" through NMB representational proceedings); Delpro, 509 F.Supp. at 472, 474 . 21 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jacqueline and Salvadore A. Dipippa v. United States
See, e.g., Van Houten v. Ralls, 411 F.2d 940, 943 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 962 , 90 S.Ct. 436 , 24 L.Ed.2d 426 (1969); Noga v. United States, 411 F.2d 943, 944 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 841 , 90 S.Ct. 104 , 24 L.Ed.2d 92 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Van Houten
v.
Ralls
v.
Ralls
No. 613.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 8, 1969.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckelshaus, and Morton Hollander for respondents.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion to dispense with printing petition granted. Certiorari denied.