Bell Lines, Inc. v. United States, 397 U.S. 818 (1970). · Go Syfert
Search
Bell Lines, Inc. v. United States, 397 U.S. 818 (1970). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this court under 28 u.s.c. 1253 .”
61 citation events across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hays v. State of La. (ca5, 1994-04-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Hays v. State of La.
5th Cir. · 1994 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the judgment appealed from does not include an order granting or denying an interlocutory or permanent injunction and is therefore not appealable to this court under 28 u.s.c. 1253 .
cited Cited "see" Richard Nixon v. Honorable Charles R. Richey, United States District Court for the District of Columbia
D.C. Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center, 397 U.S. 820 , 90 S.Ct. 1517 , 25 L.Ed.2d 806 (1970); Goldstein v. Cox, supra note 134 , 396 U.S. at 475 , 90 S.Ct. at 674, 24 L.Ed.2d at 667-668 ; 9 J.
discussed Cited "see" Mobile Home Express, Ltd. v. United States (2×)
W.D. Okla. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bell Lines, Inc. v. United States, 306 F.Supp. 209 (S.D.W.Va.), aff’d., 397 U.S. 818 , 90 S.Ct. 1517 , 25 L.Ed.2d 804 ; Caravelle Express, Inc. v. United States, 287 F.Supp. 585 (D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States (2×)
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Bell Lines, Inc. v. United States, 306 F.Supp. 209 (S.D.W.Va.1969), Aff'd per curiam, 397 U.S. 818 , 90 S.Ct. 1517 , 25 L.Ed.2d 804 (1970) (forty protests filed) 7 In fact, the government concedes that a reasoned opinion would be necessary in a particular case, but argues that this is not that case.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States (2×)
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Bell Lines, Inc. v. United States, 306 F.Supp. 209 (S.D.W.Va.1969), aff’d per curiam, 397 U.S. 818 , 90 S.Ct. 1517 , 25 L.Ed.2d 804 (1970) (forty protests filed). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BELL LINES, INC., ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
893.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 4, 1970.
397 U.S. 818
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 74%
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA.

Harold Hernly, William T. Brotherton, Harry J. Jordan, Robert S. Burk, Robert R. Redmon, James E. Wilson, Edward G. Villalon, and Charles H. Ephraim for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Robert W. Ginnane, Fritz R. Kahn, and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and A. Alvis Layne for Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service, ante, p. 532.