green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Chan v. Judicial Council
“In conducting rational-basis equal protection analysis, ‘ “a legislative choice is not subject to courtroom factfinding and may be based on rational speculation unsupported by evidence or empirical data.” ’ ” (In re Jenkins (2010) 50 Cal.4th 1167, 1181 [ 116 Cal.Rptr.3d 790 , 240 P.3d 260 ], quoting Warden v. State Bar (1999) 21 Cal.4th 628, 650 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 283 , 982 P.2d 154 ]; see FCC v. Beach Communications, Inc. (1993) 508 U.S. 307, 315 [ 124 L.Ed.2d 211 , 113 S.Ct. 2096 ].) Rational review requires merely that “distinctions drawn by a challenged statute bear some ratio…
discussed
Cited "see"
County of Riverside v. Whitlock
They were made in response to the suggestion that the “one-person, one-vote” principle should only apply to elections of lawmakers as distinguished from administrators (Hadley v. Junior College District, supra, 397 U.S. 50 ; see Kramer v. Union Free School Dist., supra, 395 U.S. 621 ) or, at the very most, to elections of public officials and not to elections involving other governmental choices such as those involving public fiscal matters (Westbrook v. Mihaly, supra, 2 Cal.3d 765 [vacated on other grounds 403 U.S. 915 ]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sandra Faucher and Maine Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission
The Supreme Court, recognizing that such broad language as found in section 441b(a) creates the potential for first amendment violations, sought to avoid future conflict by explicitly limiting the statute’s prohibition to “express advocacy.” Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 42-43 , 96 S.Ct. 612, 645-46 , 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976); see also United States v. Thirty-Seven Photographs, 402 U.S. 363, 369 , 91 S.Ct. 1400, 1404-05 , 28 L.Ed.2d 822 , reh’g denied, 403 U.S. 924 , 91 S.Ct. 2221 , 29 L.Ed.2d 702 reh’g denied sub nom., United States v. Reidel, 403 U.S. 924 , 91 S.Ct. 2223 , 29 L.Ed.2d …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adams
v.
Board of Regents of the State of Florida
v.
Board of Regents of the State of Florida
No. 105.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1971.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 20 opinions | Published
Appeal from D. C. M. D. Fla. Judgment vacated and case remanded' for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decision in Connell v. Higginbotham, ante, p. 207.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.