green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Myers v. Baca
seizure" of police officers for lineup in investigation of "brutal or unlawful" conduct not subject to warrant or probable cause requirements because investigation was not "directed solely toward the objective of criminal prosecution
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rastelli
See United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114, 118-19 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sherr
See United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Boratto
(2×)
See United States v. Sweig, 441 F. 2d 114 (2 Cir.), cert. den. 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed. 2d 711 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hubbard
See United States v. Sweig, 316 F.Supp. 1148, 1158 (S.D.N.Y.1970), aff’d 441 F.2d 114, 118-19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. DePalma
See Id., United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114, 118 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hilliard
The joinder requirements of Rule 8(b) are satisfied only if the co-defendants are alleged to have “participated * * * in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses.” In assessing the propriety of joinder under Rule 8(b), as well as under a kindred aspect of Rule 8(a), 2 “the predominant consideration is whether joinder would serve the goals of trial economy and convenience,” Baker v. United States, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 7 , 401 F.2d 958, 971 (1968), “consistent with minimum prejudice” to defendants, 8 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 8.06[2], at 8-36 (2d ed. 1…
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur Lee Dennis v. Joe S. Hopper, Warden, Georgia State Prison
See Willis v. Smith, 5 Cir. 1970, 434 F.2d 1029 , cert. denied 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2261 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marcus Monteiro Albuquerque and Thomas Vincent Radice
(2×)
See United States v. Golembiewski, 437 F.2d 1212 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2260 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elden Turcotte and Forrest Gerry, Jr.
See United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114, 117 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James v. Pacente
(2×)
See United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114, 118-119 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed. 711 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Medina v. United States
See United States v. Fort, 143 U.S.App.D.C. 255 , 270-271, 443 F.2d 670, 685-686 (1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2255 , 29 L.Ed.2d 710 (1971); United States v. Parker, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 97, 99 , 419 F.2d 679, 681 (1969). *171 The prosecutor’s allusion to the complainant’s belief that he was coming to court for appellant’s sentencing, rather than his retrial, was not necessary to an effective rebuttal of defense counsel’s insinuations, and therefore was improper.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mitchell
See United States v. Sweig, 316 F.Supp. 1148 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Geehring v. Municipal Court of Girard
See MacDonald v. Shawnee Country Club, Inc., 438 F.2d 632 , cert. den. 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2255 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 , reh. den. 404 U.S. 875 , 92 S.Ct. 31 , 30 L.Ed.2d 121 (C.A. 6, 1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Froehlke
See Named Individual Members of San Antonio Conservation Society v. Texas Highway Department, 446 F.2d 1013, 1028 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2257 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 . 162 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Rogers
(2×)
United States v. Montes-Cardenas, 746 F.2d 771, 776 (1984); see also United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 . 118-19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971). [1] See, e.g., § 18-1-302(1)(a)(II), 8B C.R.S. (1986) (prosecution for violation of different provision of law than former prosecution is barred, and also prosecution based on different facts is barred, when former prosecution results in acquittal or conviction and subsequent prosecution is for same conduct, unless offense in former prosecution and offense in subsequent prosecution each requires proof …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alberto Montes-Cardenas, A/K/A Tony Campos
See, e.g., United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114, 118-19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 2256 , 29 L.Ed.2d 711 (1971); United States v. Weber, 437 F.2d 327, 331 (3d Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 932 , 91 S.Ct. 1524 , 28 L.Ed.2d 867 (1971); see also United States v. Halper, 590 F.2d 422, 429 (2d Cir.1978) (joinder improper when commission of one crime did not lead to the commission of the other and proof of one did not constitute proof of the other).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vollmer
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1678.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 1971.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied..