green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Midwest Plastic Fabricators, Inc. v. Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
the licensor owes an affirmative duty to the public to assure that in the hands of his licensee the trade-mark continues to represent that which it purports to represent.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Clarence J. Quinn, Jr.
Ct. 1170, 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Spencer v. United States
E.g., Clifford v. United States, 532 A.2d 628, 633-634 (D.C.1987) (“The need to permit a criminal defendant the means to expose the basis of expert evidence against him is particularly strong” (citations omitted)); accord, e.g., United States v. Williams, 447 F.2d 1285, 1290 (5th Cir.1971) (en banc) (defendant’s Confrontation Clause rights are infringed when court does not permit cross-examination about basis of expert’s opinion), cert. denied, 405 U.S. *419 954, 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Durkay v. Madco Oil Co., Inc.
See Bradford v. Thompson, 470 S.W.2d 638, 636 (Tex.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1174 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972) and Slaughter v. Qualls, 162 S.W.2d 671, 675 (Tex.1942) (foreclosure sale void when note not in default at that time); McLaren v. Jones, 89 Tex. 131 , 33 S.W. 849, 850 (1896) (sale not held on first Tuesday of month is void); Pentad Joint Venture v. First Nat’l Bank of La Grange, 797 S.W.2d 92, 96 (Tex.App.—Austin 1990, writ denied) and Jinkins v. Chambers, 622 S.W.2d 614, 615 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1981, no writ) (irregularity in sale causing grossly inadequate price ren…
cited
Cited "see"
Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corporation
See United States v. Williams, 447 F.2d 1285, 1290-91 (5th Cir.1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 954 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp.
See United States v. Williams, 447 F.2d 1285, 1290-91 (5th Cir.1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 954 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. DSC OF NEWARK ENTER., INC.
See Bradford v. Thompson, 460 S.W.2d 932 (Tex. Civ.App. 1970), reversed in part on other grounds, 470 S.W.2d 633 (Tex. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1174 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Metromedia Broadcasting Corp. v. MGM/UA Entertainment Co.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 52 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); Kypta v. McDonald’s Corp., 671 F.2d 1282 , 1285 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 857 , 103 S.Ct. 127 , 74 L.Ed.2d 109 (1982); Casey, 590 F.Supp. at 1571-2; see also United States Steel Corp. v. Fortner Enters., Inc., 429 U.S. 610 , 97 S.Ct. 861 , 51 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re AH Robins Co., Inc.
See United States v. Diorio, 451 F.2d 21, 24 (2nd Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1173 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); United States v. Anderson, 433 F.2d 856, 860 (8th Cir.1970); Edwards v. United States, 334 F.2d 360, 363 (5th Cir.1964).
cited
Cited "see"
3 P.M., Inc. v. Basic Four Corp.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); c.f.
discussed
Cited "see"
F. E. L. Publications, Ltd. v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); cf. Tire Sales Corp. v. Cities Service Oil Co., 410 F.Supp. 1222, 1227 (N.D.Ill.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Malcolm Eugene Ratliff
See United States v. Williams, 447 F.2d 1285, 1289-90 (5th Cir. 1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 954 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Electroglas, Inc. v. Dynatex Corp.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 52 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Allen
See United States v. Williams, 447 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir. 1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 954 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972); Jenkins v. United States, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 307 F.2d 637 (D.C.Cir.1962) (en banc). . 28 U.S.C.A., Fed.R.Evid., p. 504. .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. A. Gordon Eldred
See United States v. Menna, 451 F.2d 982, 984 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 963 , 92 S.Ct. 1170 , 31 L.Ed.2d 238 (1972); Sullivan v. United States, 414 F.2d 714, 715 (9th Cir. 1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Colburn v. Roto-Rooter Corp.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir. 1971), cert, denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972). .
cited
Cited "see"
Burdis v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
See Laird v. Hudson Engineering Corp., 5 Cir., 1971, 449 F.2d 216 , cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1177 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lionel Burdis v. The Texas & Pacific Railway Company, Commercial Union Insurance Company, Intervenor
See Laird v. Hudson Engineering Corp., 5 Cir., 1971, 449 F.2d 216 , cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1177 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972). 6 Second, plaintiff Burdis submits that the district court erred by admitting into evidence a state court petition filed prior to the instant action in which Burdis sought recovery of damages from the insurer of the driver of the car.
cited
Cited "see"
Arellano v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
See Johnson v. Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 282 A.2d 566, 567-68 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1175 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Arellano v. DIST. OF COL. POLICE, ETC.
See Johnson v. Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 282 A.2d 566, 567-68 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1175 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Krehl v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Co.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 46 (9th Cir. 1971), cert, denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hanna v. State
(2×)
See the discussion contained in United States v. Williams, 447 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 954 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 , rehearing denied, 405 U.S. 1048 , 92 S.Ct. 1308 , 31 L.Ed.2d 591 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Stoner v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief Board
See Johnson v. Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 282 A.2d 566, 567-68 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1175 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972). 2 We conclude that the order was based upon factual conclusions which are unsupported by substantial evidence, and reverse.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stoner v. DISTRICT OF COL. POL. & FIRE., ETC.
See Johnson v. Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 282 A.2d 566, 567-68 (1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1175 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972). [2] We conclude that the order was based upon factual conclusions which are unsupported by substantial evidence, and reverse.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clarkson Co. v. Shaheen
(2×)
See Morning Telegraph v. Powers, 450 F.2d 97, 99 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 954 , 92 S.Ct. 1170 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Clarkson Co., Ltd. v. Shaheen
(2×)
See Morning Telegraph v. Powers, 450 F.2d 97, 99 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 954 , 92 S.Ct. 1170 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972) 5 As alien corporations organized under the laws of another country, PRC and NRC are probably deemed to be citizens exclusively of Canada for diversity purposes.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barker
(2×)
See Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441 , 92 S.Ct. 1170 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972). .
cited
Cited "see"
Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Co.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 47 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Company, Inc.
See Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 47 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
examined
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,517 United States of America v. Philip Zane, and Morton S. Kaplan
(3×)
See United States v. Jacobs, 451 F.2d 530 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S. Ct. 1170 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972); Petersen v. United States, 268 F.2d 87 (10th Cir. 1959).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Steven Garner
See United States v. Menna, 451 F.2d 982 (9 Cir., 1971), cert. den. 405 U.S. 963 , 92 S.Ct. 1170 , 31 L.Ed.2d 238 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Orca Assets, G.P., L.L.C. Orca/ICI Development Orca Petroleum, Ltd. And Allen Berry v. Louis Dorfman K.I. Holdings, Ltd. Sam Myers J.M.D. Resources, Inc. Billy Cogdell Bowden Barbara Standfield Stacey Dorfman-Kivowitz Julia Dorfman Mark Dorfman David Phillip Cook Cheryl King Cook Sam Y. Dorfman, Jr.
Cf. Poag v. Flories, 317 S.W.3d 820, 825 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2010, pet. denied) (“A void deed is without vitality or legal effect.”); see also Bradford v. Thompson, 470 S.W.2d 633, 635, 637 (Tex. 1971) (concluding that a foreclosure was “null and void” and therefore declaring that a trustee’s deed arising from the foreclosure was “cancelled and held for naught”), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 (1972); Black’s Law Dictionary 1805 (defining void to mean “[o]f no legal effect” or “null”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Orca Assets, G.P., L.L.C. v. Dorfman
Cf. Poag v. Flories, 317 S.W.3d 820, 825 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2010, pet. denied) (“A void deed is without vitality , or legal effect.”); see also Bradford v. Thompson, 470 S.W.2d 633, 635 , 637' (Tex. 1971) (concluding that'a foreclosure was “null and void” and therefore declaring that a trustee’s deed arising from the foreclosure was “cancelled and held for náught”), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1174 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); Black’s Law Dictionary 1805 (defining void to mean “[o]f no legal effect” or “null”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith
Compare Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1173 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972), where it was held impermissible for the franchisor to control distribution of items needed for operation of a franchise when the criteria for those items could be set by specifications, with Krehl v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Co., 78 F.R.D. 108 (1978), in which the court held that the franchisor could control distribution of the product when it was the ultimate product being consumed by the customer.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hutto
See also United States v. Williams, 447 F.2d 1285, 1288 (5th Cir.1971) (en banc), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 954 , 92 S.Ct. 1168 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972) (Supreme Court’s decision in California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149 , 90 S.Ct. *225 1930, 26 L.Ed.2d 489 (1970), made it clear that “the right of confrontation and the rule against hearsay present two distinct, albeit related questions”); Hopkinson v. State, 632 P.2d 79 (Wyo.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 922 , 102 S.Ct. 1280 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (values of hearsay rule and Confrontation Clause are not identical; admission of certain evidence m…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grynberg Production Corp. v. British Gas, P.L.C.
Eagle Properties, Ltd. v. Scharbauer, 807 S.W.2d 714, 723 (Tex.1990); see also, Bradford v. Thompson, 460 S.W.2d 932, 936 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1970) (reliance in a fraud case can manifest itself as entering into a contract or otherwise acting to one’s hurt), rev’d on other grounds, 470 S.W.2d 633 (Tex.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1174 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972). 5.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Burkert v. Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc.
See, e.g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 51-52 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 96 S. Ct. 1172 , 31 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Dunleavy
Thus, this court has previously held that a judge has “a duty to preside ... in the absence of some statute, rule of court, ethical standard, or other compelling reason to the contrary.” See Ham v. District Court, 93 Nev. 409 , 566 P.2d 420 (1977); see also United States v. Diorio, 451 F.2d 21, 24 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 (1972); Wolfson v. Palmieri, 396 F.2d 121 , 124 (2d Cir. 1968); Rosen v. Sugarman, 357 F.2d 794 , 797-98 (2d Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goldman v. Bryan
Thus, this court has previously held that a judge has “a duty to preside ... in the absence of some statute, rule of court, ethical standard, or other compelling reason to the contrary.” See Ham v. District Court, 93 Nev. 409 , 566 P.2d 420 (1977); see also United States v. Diorio, 451 F.2d 21, 24 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 (1972); Wolfson v. Palmieri, 396 F.2d 121 , 124 (2d Cir. 1968); Rosen v. Sugarman, 357 F.2d 794 , 797-98 (2d Cir. 1966).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William Cohen & Son, Inc. v. All American Hero, Inc.
See, e.g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir.1971), cert. den., 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde
(2×)
Compare, e. g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F. 2d 43 (CA9 1971), cert. denied, 405 U. S. 955 (1972), with Continental T.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olmstead v. Amoco Oil Co.
See, e.g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972) (the defendant franchisor was charged with unlawfully tying its franchise license with the purchase of its restaurant supplies).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olmstead v. Amoco Oil Company
See, e.g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972) (the defendant franchisor was charged with unlawfully tying its franchise license with the purchase of its restaurant supplies).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Grason Electric Co. v. Sacramento Municipal Utility District
See, e.g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 47-49 (9th Cir.1971), cert.denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1173 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Parks v. Watson
See, e.g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 47 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1173 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Parks v. Watson
See, e.g., Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 47 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1173 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pugh v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See also Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.
(2×)
See, e. g., Morning Telegraph v. Powers, 450 F.2d 97 (2nd Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 954 , 92 S.Ct. 1170 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972). 7 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rosa
(3×)
See also United States v. Jacobs, 451 F.2d 530, 534 (5th Cir. 1971) cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1170 , 31 L.Ed.2d 231 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Motor Inns, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc., International Association of Holiday Inns, Intervenor-Defendant
See also Bascom Launder Corp. v. Telecoin Corp., 204 F.2d at 331, 335 (2d Cir. 1953). 59 . 448 F.2d 43 , 51 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972). 60 . 506 F.2d 934 , 942-43 (5th Cir. 1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Armour & Co.
v.
Local Union No. 186, United Packinghouse, Food & Allied Workers, AFL-CIO
v.
Local Union No. 186, United Packinghouse, Food & Allied Workers, AFL-CIO
No. 71-788.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 1972.
Cited by 129 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.