Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb, 415 U.S. 952 (1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb, 415 U.S. 952 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies”
48 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Masayesva v. Zah (azd, 1992-03-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Masayesva v. Zah
D. Ariz. · 1992 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
where legislation expressly provides a particular remedy or remedies, courts should not expand the coverage of the statute to subsume other remedies
cited Cited "see" Culpepper v. Inland Mortgage Corp.
N.D. Ala. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Pipe & Const. Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 547 , 94 S.Ct. 756 , 38 L.Ed.2d 713 (1974), reh’g denied, 415 U.S. 952 , 94 S.Ct. 1477 , 39 L.Ed.2d 568 .
discussed Cited "see" South African Marine Corp., Ltd. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. National Association of Railroad Passengers, 414 U.S. 453, 457-58 , 94 S.Ct. 690, 692-93 , 38 L.Ed.2d 646 reh’g denied, 415 U.S. 952 , 94 S.Ct. 1478 , 39 L.Ed.2d 568 (1974).
cited Cited "see" In re Consumers Power Co. Securities Litigation
E.D. Mich. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See American Pipe & Constr. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 552-55 , 94 S.Ct. 756, 765-67 , 38 L.Ed.2d 713 (1974), rehr’g denied, 415 U.S. 952 , 94 S.Ct. 1477 , 39 L.Ed.2d 568 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Alaska Bulk Carriers, Inc., Trinidad Corporation v. Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary of Commerce, U.S. Department of Commerce Shell Oil Company (A Delaware Corporation) v. Juanita M. Kreps (Individually and as Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce Acting in Her Official Capacity) Alaska Bulk Carriers, Inc., Trinidad Corporation v. Juanita M. Kreps, Secretary of Commerce, U.S. Department of Commerce, Polk Tanker Corporation, Shell Oil Company (A Delaware Corporation) v. Juanita M. Kreps (Individually and as Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce Acting in Her Official Capacity), Seatrain Shipbuilding Corp. And Polk Tanker Corp.
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Contract between the Maritime Subsidy Board and Polk Tanker Corporation, Contract MA/MSB-165, Article 9(d), Jt.App. at 160, 178 ("The foregoing provisions (which require the purchaser to operate the vessel exclusively in foreign trade) shall run with the title to the Vessel and be binding on all owners thereof.") 27 46 U.S.C. § 1156 (1970) 28 Id 29 Id 30 Shell Oil Co. v. Kreps et al., supra, 445 F.Supp. at 1135 (emphasis of the District Court) 31 See, e. g., National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Nat'l Ass'n of Railroad Passengers, 414 U.S. 453, 458 , 94 S.Ct. 690 , 38 L.Ed.2d 646 (1974), R…
cited Cited "see" In re International House of Pancakes Franchise Litigation
W.D. Mo. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See, American Pipe and Construction Co. v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 552-554 , 94 S.Ct. 756 , 38 L.Ed.2d 713 (1973), reh. den. 415 U.S. 952 , 94 S.Ct. 1477 , 39 L.Ed.2d 568 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Robson v. United States
1st Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
Consequently, petitioner’s conviction was a violation of due process, Thompson v. City of Louisville, 362 U.S. 199 , 80 S.Ct. 624 , 4 L.Ed.2d 654 (1960); see Vachon v. New Hampshire, 414 U.S. 478, 480 , 94 S.Ct. 664 , 38 L.Ed.2d 666,rehearing denied, 415 U.S. 952 , 94 S.Ct. 1477 , 39 L.Ed.2d 568 (1974); Douglas v. Buder, 412 U.S. 430 , 93 S.Ct. 2199 , 37 L.Ed.2d 52 (1973); Harris v. United States, 404 U.S. 1232, 1233 , 92 S.Ct. 10 , 30 L.Ed.2d 25 (1971) (Douglas, J., in chambers); Johnson v. Florida, 391 U.S. 596, 598 , 88 S.Ct. 1713 , 20 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968) (per curiam); Adderley v. Florida,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Old Republic Insurance v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
More specifically stated, “where Congress ... has carefully employed a term in one place and excluded it in another, it should not be implied where excluded.” Marshall v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 621 F.2d 1246, 1251 (3d Cir.1980); see also South African Marine Corp. v. United States, 10 CIT -, 640 F.Supp. 247, 252-53 (1986) (citing National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. National Association of Railroad Passengers, 414 U.S. 453, 457-58 , 94 S.Ct. 690, 692-93 , 38 L.Ed.2d 646 reh’g denied, 415 U.S. 952 , 94 S.Ct. 1478 , 39 L.Ed.2d 568 (1974)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gutierrez v. Mofid (2×)
Cal. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
Express Agency (1944) 321 U.S. 342, 348 [ 88 L.Ed. 788, 792 , *899 64 S.Ct. 582 ]; see also American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah (1974) 414 U.S. 538, 554 [ 38 L.Ed.2d 713, 727 , 94 S.Ct. 756 ], rehg. den., 415 U.S. 952 [ 39 L.Ed.2d 568 , 94 S.Ct. 1477 ]; Davies, supra, 14 Cal.3d at p. 512 .) Limitations statutes afford repose by giving security and stability to human affairs. ( Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc. (1983) 33 Cal.3d 604, 615 [ 189 Cal. Rptr. 871 , 659 P.2d 1160 ]; Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 773, 787 [ 157 Cal. Rptr. 392 , 598 P.2d 45 ].) "In ordi…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ahne v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.
E.D. Wis. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also American Pipe & Construction Company v. Utah, 414 U.S. 538, 547 , 94 S.Ct. 756, 763 , 38 L.Ed.2d 713 , rehearing denied, 415 U.S. 952 , 94 S.Ct. 1477 , 39 L.Ed.2d 568 (1974) (1966 amendment to Rule 23 designed “to assure that members of the class would be identified before trial on the merits and would be bound by all subsequent orders and judgments”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Alaska Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Kreps
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Nat’l Ass’n of Railroad Passengers, 414 U.S. 453, 458 , 94 S.Ct. 690 , 38 L.Ed.2d 646 (1974), reh. denied, 415 U.S. 952 , 94 S.Ct. 1478 , 39 L.Ed.2d 568 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Communist Party of Indiana
v.
Whitcomb, Governor of Indiana American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah Vachon v. New Hampshire Harrison Property Management Co., Inc. v. United States Schneider v. California Miller v. United States Chavez v. McCarthy, Warden Madden v. Circuit Court for Dodge County
No. 72-1040; No. 72-1195; No. 73-573; No. 73-618; No. 73-5308; No. 73-5550; No. 73-5712; No. 73-5781.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 1974.
415 U.S. 952
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: D. Arizona (1)

Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar