Dist. of Columbia v. Walters, 419 U.S. 1065 (1974). · Go Syfert
Dist. of Columbia v. Walters, 419 U.S. 1065 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
103 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Jones (pa, 1992-05-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Jones (2×)
Pa. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136, 148-50 , 318 A.2d 680, 687-88 (1974) (adequacy of curative instructions), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Morris (2×)
Pa. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 318 A.2d 680 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974) (improper comment by the Commonwealth cured by immediate cautionary instruction and jury charge).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Clark (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 318 A.2d 680 , appeal dismissed, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974) (defendant is not entitled to a perfectly conducted trial so long as he has been accorded a fair trial by an impartial jury).
examined Cited "see" Lee v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review (4×)
D.C. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See District of Columbia v. Walters, D.C.App., 319 A.2d 332 , 338 n.13, appeal dismissed, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 650 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Henderson
Pa. Super. Ct. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Stoltzfus, 462 Pa. 43 , 337 A.2d 873 , appeal dismissed, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 (1975) (no error in refusing specific instruction covered by general charge); Commonwealth v. Perry, supra (same).
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Stoltzfus
Pa. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 318 A.2d 680 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974). 3 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Atchison v. District of Columbia (2×)
D.C. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also District of Columbia v. Walters, 319 A.2d 332 , 338 n. 13 (D.C.), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 650 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Story (2×)
Pa. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 160 n.15, 318 A.2d 680 , 693 n.15, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 , 95 S.Ct. 651 (1974) (error harmless if harmless beyond a reasonable doubt); Commonwealth v. Davis, 455 Pa. 466, 467 , 317 A.2d 218, 218 (1974) (per curiam) (same); Commonwealth v. Canales, 454 Pa. 422, 428 , 311 A.2d 572, 575 (1973) (error not harmless in case where erroneously admitted evidence corroborated testimony "critical to the prosecution" and disputed by the defendant); Commonwealth v. Ravenell, 448 Pa. 162 , 292 A.2d 365 (1972) (error harmless where …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Bullard
Pa. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 160 n. 15, 318 A.2d 680 , 693 n. 15, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S.Ct. 651 , 42 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974); Commonwealth v. Davis, 455 Pa. 466, 467 , 317 A.2d 218 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Piper (2×)
Pa. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth v. Martinolich, 456 Pa. 136 , 150 n.10, 318 A.2d 680 , 688 n.10, cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1065 , 95 S. Ct. 651 (1974); Commonwealth v. Yount, 455 Pa. 303, 318-19 , 314 A.2d 242, 250 (1974); Commonwealth v. Jennings, 442 Pa. 18, 24 , 274 A.2d 767, 770 (1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
District of Columbia
v.
Walters
No. 74-284.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1974.
419 U.S. 1065
Jurisdiction, Set, Would.
Published

Appeal from Ct. App. D. C. dismissed for want of properly presented federal question. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice White would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.