green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ott v. Kaiser-Georgetown Community Health Plan, Inc.
But see Pitts v. Woodward and Lothrop, 327 A.2d 816 (D.C.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 832 , 42 L.Ed.2d 841 (1975) (in forum non conveniens inquiry, when forum has no particular interest in parties or subject matter to suit, fact that defendant incorporated in forum carries little weight).
cited
Cited "see"
Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. v. Jefferson
See Pitts v. Woodward & Lothrop, 327 A.2d 816, 817 (D.C.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 832 , 42 L.Ed.2d 841 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anteous Winslow
See United States v. Norris, 873 F.2d 1519, 1526 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 113 (1989), quoting United States v. Liddy, 509 F.2d 428, 438-39 (D.C.Cir.1974) (en banc ), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 (1975); see also United States v. Benefield, 889 F.2d 1061, 1066 (11th Cir.1989). 3 The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Doe
See United States v. Liddy, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 95, 101-102 , 509 F.2d 428, 434-435 (1974) (ew banc), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 842 (1975) (individual voir dire examination regarding pretrial publicity is required whenever it is believed that there is a significant possibility that a prospective juror may be ineligible to serve because of exposure to potentially prejudicial publicity).
cited
Cited "see"
Revelle v. State
See Smith v. State, 513 S.W.2d 407, 411 (Mo. banc 1974), cert denied 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 832 , 42 L.Ed.2d 841 (1975); Wade v. State, 698 S.W.2d 621, 623 (Mo.App.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Musgrove v. United States
The trial court’s ruling on the content and scope of voir dire will not be reversed on appeal “[a]bsent an abuse of discretion prejudicing a party’s rights.” Coleman v. United States, D.C.App., 379 A.2d 951, 954 (1977); accord, United States v. Liddy, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 95, 101-02 , 509 F.2d 428, 434-35 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 842 (1975); United States v. Robinson, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 265, 269 , 475 F.2d 376, 380 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Cowell v. State
See Martin v. State, (1974) 262 Ind. 232 , 314 N.E.2d 60 , cert. denied, (1975) 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 841 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Stearns Giese
(2×)
See United States v. Liddy, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 95, 103-104 , 509 F.2d 428, 436-37 (1974), Cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 842 (1975); United States v. Polizzi, supra, 500 F.2d at 879-80 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gold
See United States v. Liddy, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 95, 111 , 509 F.2d 428, 444 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 842 (1975). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darryl Gordon Hickman and Fred McArthur Head
See United States v. Liddy, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 95 , 509 F.2d 428, 437-442 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 842 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Alder Branch Realty Ltd. Partnership
See also Pitts v. Woodward & Lothrop, 327 A.2d 816, 817 (D.C.1974) (affirming dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds because “[i]t is not sufficient, when an issue of forum non conveniens or change of venue is timely raised in a civil action, to show that the court in which it has been filed clearly has jurisdiction over the defendant”), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 832 , 42 L.Ed.2d 841 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Medeiros
See, e.g., United States v. Liddy, 509 F.2d 428, 438 (1974) (holding that the federal trial judge has “inherent authority” to call or recall and question witnesses when he or she “believes the additional testimony will be helpful to the jurors in ascertaining the truth and discharging their fact-finding function[ ]”), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 842 (1975); United States v. Browne, 313 F.2d 197, 199 (2d Cir.) (“It is a well-settled rule that a judge presiding over a criminal trial in a federal District Court may, in the exercise of a sound discretion, and i…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Washita Construction Company, and Billy Ray Anthony
See, e.g., United States v. Liddy, 509 F.2d 428 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 842 (1975) (G.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Columbia Broadcasting Systems, Inc. v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California
See also United States v. Liddy, 509 F.2d 428, 436-37 (D.C.Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 842 (1975). 7 20 Thus, both precedent and experience indicate that widespread publicity, without more, does not automatically lead to an unfair trial.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Columbia Broadcasting Systems, Inc. v. United States District Court
See also United States v. Liddy, 509 F.2d 428, 436-37 (D.C.Cir.1974) (en banc), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 842 (1975). 7 Thus, both precedent and experience indicate that widespread publicity, without more, does not automatically lead to an unfair trial.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Mroczko
See also Martin v. State (1974) 262 Ind. 232 [ 314 N.E.2d 60, 66-67, fn. 3 ], cert. den. (1975) 420 U.S. 911 [ 42 L.Ed.2d 841 , 95 S.Ct. 833 ].) 32 Separate counsel will assure that each defendant’s interests are as fully protected as possible.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Giles v. State
See also, Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U.S. 637 , 96 S.Ct. 2253 , 49 L.Ed.2d 108 (1976), and Smith v. State, 513 S.W.2d 407 (Mo. banc 1974), cert. *109 denied, 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 832 , 42 L.Ed.2d 841 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John D. Ehrlichman
(2×)
See e. g., Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 727 , 81 S.Ct. 1639 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961), discussed in United States v. Liddy, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 95, 101 , 509 F.2d 428, 435-36 (1974), cert. denied 420 U.S. 911 , 95 S.Ct. 833 , 42 L.Ed.2d 842 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gonzales-Solano
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-5564.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1975.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.