green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co.
the inherent inoperativeness of the printing plates as disclosed in the french patent and the explicit ineffectiveness of the diazo compounds of zahn militate against a conclusion of obviousness
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Stern v. Carter
Nissan Motor Corp. v Sanderson, 421 US 914 ), the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals described an order of the District Court granting such disclosure as an “unwarranted extension of the Su preme Court’s decision in Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin * * * which extension would limit and curtail Rule 23 in a manner never contemplated.” In Sanderson (supra, p 478) plaintiffs sought a writ of mandamus and prohibition from the Tenth Circuit directing the District Court to vacate certain discovery orders and prohibit it from issuing future discovery orders “which would invade the attorney-client pr…
cited
Cited "see"
Roseman v. Sports & Recreation
See Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477, 480 (10th Cir.1974) (per curiam), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); In re McDonnell Douglas Corp. Sec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corporation v. Grant Thornton
The federal discovery rules generally prohibit a litigant from discovering an opponent’s assets “until after a judgment against the opponent has been rendered.” FTC v. Turner, 609 F.2d 743, 745 (5th Cir.1980); accord Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477, 479-80 (10th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); RTC v. Feffer, 793 F.Supp. 11, 14 (D.D.C.1992); cf. Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Bunting v. Sun Co.
See Peymann v. Perini Corp., 507 F.2d 1318 (1st Cir.1974), cert. den., 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1572 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Key Bank of Puget Sound v. Oceanida One, Inc.
See Peymann v. Perini Corp., 507 F.2d 1318, 1322 (1st Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 (1975). 10 Wolf does not challenge the court's findings regarding seaworthiness and negligence.
cited
Cited "see"
Kaplan v. Pomerantz
See Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477, 479 (10th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); Rand v. Monsanto Co., No. 85 C 9087 (N.D.Ill.
cited
Cited "see"
Haywood v. Barnes
See Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477, 479-80 (10th Cir.1974) (per curiam), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); Dirks, supra, at 134 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradford v. General Telephone Co. of Michigan
See Gibson v. Kroger Co., 506 F.2d 647, 650 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1571 , 43 L.Ed.2d 779 (1975); Stebbins v. Continental Insurance Co., 442 F.2d 843, 845-46 (D.C.Cir.1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Dirks v. Clayton Brokerage Co.
See Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477, 479-80 (10th Cir.1974) (per curiam), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Gerald F. Kendrick, Sr. v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Company
Accord, Peymann v. Perini Corp., 507 F.2d 1318, 1322-23 (1st Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1572 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); Noack v. American S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
Stahler v. Jamesway Corp.
See Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477, 480 (10th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kamens v. Horizon Corp.
See Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477 (10th Cir. 1974), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); Sayre v. Abraham Lincoln Savings & Loan Association, 65 F.R.D. 379 (E.D.Pa.1974), modified, 69 F.R.D. 117 (1975); but see Hurwitz v. R.
cited
Cited "see"
Plummer v. CHICAGO JOURNEYMAN PLUMBERS, ETC.
See Gibson v. Kroger Co., 506 F.2d 647, 650 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1571 , 43 L.Ed.2d 779 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Plummer v. Chicago Journeyman Plumbers' Local Union No. 130
See Gibson v. Kroger Co., 506 F.2d 647, 650 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1571 , 43 L.Ed.2d 779 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aluminum Company of America, a Corporation, and Alcoa Sport Products Company, a Corporation v. Amerola Products Corporation, a Corporation Aluminum Company of America, a Corporation, and Alcoa Sport Products Company, a Corporation v. Amerola Products Corporation, a Corporation
Philips Electronic & Pharmaceutical Industries Corp. v. Thermal & Electronics Industries, Inc., 450 F.2d 1164, 1176 (3d Cir. 1971); see Layne-New York Co. v. Allied Asphalt Co., 501 F.2d 405, 407 (3d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1572 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); U. S. Expansion Bolt Co. v. Jordan Industries, Inc., 488 F.2d 566, 568 (3d Cir. 1973); Hadco Products, Inc. v. Walter Kidde & Co., 462 F.2d 1265 , 1272 n. 33 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1023 , 93 S.Ct. 464 , 34 L.Ed.2d 315 (1972). 7 In the latter situation, when relevant prior art has not been considered, the deg…
discussed
Cited "see"
Aluminum Co. of America v. Amerola Products Corp.
(2×)
Philips Electronic & Pharmaceutical Industries Corp. v. Thermal & Electronics Industries, Inc., 450 F.2d 1164, 1176 (3d Cir. 1971); see Layne-New York Co. v. Allied Asphalt Co., 501 F.2d 405, 407 (3d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1572 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); U. S. Expansion Bolt Co. v. Jordan Industries, Inc., 488 F.2d 566, 568 (3d Cir. 1973); Hadco Products, Inc. v. Walter Kidde & Co., 462 F.2d 1265 , 1272 n. 33 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1023 , 93 S.Ct. 464 , 34 L.Ed.2d 315 (1972). 7 In the latter situation, when relevant prior art has not been considered, the deg…
discussed
Cited "see"
Systematic Tool & MacHine Company v. Walter Kidde & Company, Inc.
(2×)
Accord, Layne-New York Co. v. Allied Asphalt Co., 501 F.2d 405, 406 (3rd Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1572 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975)." 9 The dissenting opinion expresses concern that Mr. Karr did not represent a person having ordinary skill in the pertinent art the design of food slicing machines.
cited
Cited "see"
Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co. Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
Accord, Layne-New York Co. v. Allied Asphalt Co., 501 F.2d 405, 406 (3d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1572 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975). 19 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dujanovic v. MortgageAmerica, Inc.
See, e.g., Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477 (10th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Southeast Hotel Properties Ltd. Partnership Investor Litigation
See, e.g., Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477 (10th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); Kamens v. Horizon Corp., 81 F.R.D. 444 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kareem Yehia v. Rouge Steel Corporation
See also Burden v. Evansville Materials, Inc., 840 F.2d 343, 346 (6th Cir.1988), where we endorsed the observation of the trial judge (Meredith, J.) that "[i]t is imperative that there [be] some negligent act or omission by the seaman other than his knowledgeable acceptance of a dangerous condition." 636 F.Supp. 1022 at 1036 (emphasis supplied). 45 There is nothing to the contrary in Peymann v. Perini Corp., 507 F.2d 1318 (1st Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1572 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975), the case from which the jury instruction here at issue was borrowed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John D. McClow Jr. v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Company, M/v Seminole
See, e.g., Peymann v. Perini Corp., 507 F.2d 1318 (1st Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1572 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); Milos v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., 478 F.Supp. 1019 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff’d mem., 622 F.2d 574 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Margarito Reyes
(2×)
See also Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477 (10th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975), which held that a writ of mandamus was appropriate to vacate a discovery order in an antitrust case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jansen v. Greyhound Corp.
See eg., Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477, 479-80 (10th Cir.1974) (per curiam), cert. denied sub nom., Nissan Motor Corp. v. Sanderson, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); Dirks v. Clayton Brokerage Co. of St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Luis A. Campos v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.
See, e.g., Pey-mann v. Perini Corporation, 507 F.2d 1318 (1st Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1572 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); Mitchell v. The Trawler Racer, Inc., 362 U.S. 539 , 80 S.Ct. 926 , 4 L.Ed.2d 941 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Department of Energy v. Brimmer
See, e.g., Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477, 480 (10th Cir.1974) (“[i]n view of our ruling that the matters sought ... are irrelevant, we deem it unnecessary to determine whether the documents sought are privileged”) (mandamus issued), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Tetracycline Cases
See also, Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477 (10th Cir.1974), ce rt. denied sub nom., Nissan Motor Corp. v. Sanderson, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1573 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); Klein v. Checker Motors Corp., 87 F.R.D. 5 (N.D.Ill.1979); cf., P.D.Q., Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp., 61 F.R.D. 372 (S.D.Fla.1973). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wycoff v. Motorola, Inc.
See also Layne-New York Co. v. Allied Asphalt Co., 363 F.Supp. 299, 307 (W.D.Pa.1973), rev’d on other grounds, 501 F.2d 405 (3rd Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1572 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings in the Airline Cases
See also Gibson v. Kroger Co., 506 F.2d 647, 650 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 1571 , 43 L.Ed.2d 779 (1975); Moore v. Sunbeam Corp., 459 F.2d 811 , 821 n.6 (7th Cir. 1972); Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co., 416 F.2d 711, 718 (7th Cir. 1969); Choate v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 402 F.2d 357, 359 (7th Cir. 1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Independent Gasoline Antitrust Litigation
May 12, 1977); see, e. g., Sanderson v. Winner, 507 F.2d 477, 479 (10th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 95 S.Ct. 157 , 43 L.Ed.2d 780 (1975); Shelter Realty Corp. v. Allied Maintenance Corp., 75 F.R.D. 34, 39-40 (S.D.N.Y.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaplan v. Department of Registration & Education
Jur. 2d Physicians, Surgeons, and other Healers §§ 57, 59 (1972); Annot., 12 A.L.R. 3d 1213 (1967); compare Bruni v. Department of Registration and Education (1974), 59 Ill. 2d 6 , 319 N.E.2d 37 , cert. denied, 421 U.S. 914 , 43 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Silverlith, Inc.
v.
Azoplate Corp.
v.
Azoplate Corp.
No. 74-1041.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Apr 14, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.