green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
6.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Moss
(2×)
ismissal discourages escapes and encourages 10 fugitives to surrender.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nwankwo v. Reno
jurisdictional grant in 2241(a) ... construed as coextensive with scope of service or process, see fed.r.civ.p. 4(f) ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nwankwo v. Reno
jurisdictional grant in 2241(a) construed as coextensive with scope of service of process, see fed.r.civ.p. 4(f) ...
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
THC Financial Corp. v. Managed Investment Corp.
In American Timber & Trading Co. v. First National Bank of Oregon, 511 F.2d 980 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 921 (1975), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, applying Oregon law, found that the bank’s use of the 365/360 method of computation was usurious and agreed with the district judge’s determination that the usury statute “should be construed with regard to its net effect upon the borrower rather than upon the bookkeeping burden, custom, or convenience of the lender.” Id. at 983.
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp. v. Billman
See Estelle v. Dorrough, 420 U.S. 534 , 95 S.Ct. 1173 , 43 L.Ed.2d 377 (per curiam), reh’g denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1589 , 43 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975). 2 There is considerable state authority supporting dismissal of a direct criminal appeal brought on behalf of a fugitive.
cited
Cited "see"
Farmland Dairies v. Commissioner of the New York State Department of Agriculture & Markets
See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 , 95 S.Ct. 992 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 , reh’g denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1589 , 43 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Streicher v. Prescott
See Sero v. Preiser, 506 F.2d 1115, 1125-27 (2d Cir.1974) (class action proceeding on behalf of young adult misdemeanants challenging legality of their confinement) cert. denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1587 , 43 L.Ed.2d 789 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur Lance Bier v. Paul D. Fleming and Charles I. Alatis
See Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 318-22 , 95 S.Ct. 992, 999-1000 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 , reh’g denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1589 , 43 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 247-48 , 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1691-92 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); Hall v. United States, 704 F.2d 246, 249-50 (6th Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Purex Corp. v. Automotive, Petroleum & Allied Industries Employees Union, Local 618
See U.A.W. v. White Motor Company, 505 F.2d 1193 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1588 , 43 L.Ed.2d 789 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rainbow Glass Co. v. Local Union No. 610
See International Union of UAW v. White Motor Corp., 505 F.2d 1193, 1197 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1588 , 43 L.Ed.2d 789 (1975), quoting United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 578-80 , 80 S.Ct. 1347, 1350-51 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rainbow Glass Company v. Local Union No. 610
See International Union of UAW v. White Motor Corp., 505 F.2d 1193, 1197 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1588 , 43 L.Ed.2d 789 (1975), quoting United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 578-80 , 80 S.Ct. 1347, 1350-51 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
General Drivers, Helpers and Truck Terminal Employees, Local No. 120 v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See International Union v. White Motor Corp., 505 F.2d 1193, 1197 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1588 , 43 L.Ed.2d 789 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
General Drivers, Helpers and Truck Terminal Employees Local No. 120 v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See International Union v. White Motor Corp., 505 F.2d 1193, 1197 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1588 , 43 L.Ed.2d 789 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Taveras
Analysis Neither of these appeals implicate the so-called fugitive disentitlement doctrine, which allows appellate courts to dismiss appeals of fugitive defendants who are at large while their appeals are pending, the rationale being that the defendant’s escape “disentitles the defendant to call upon the resources of the Court for determination of his claims” (see Molinaro v New Jersey, 396 US 365, 366 [1970]; see also Estelle v Dorrough, 420 US 534, 537 [1975], reh denied 421 US 921 [1975]).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Staneart v. Board of Trustees of Ransom Memorial Hospital
See, e.g., Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 322 , 95 S.Ct. 992, 1000 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 , reh. denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1589 , 43 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re General American Communications Corp.
See also American Timber and Trading Company v. First National Bank of Oregon, 511 F.2d 980, 983 (9th Cir.1973), cert. den. 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1588 , 43 L.Ed.2d 789 (“The act of charging the interest was intentional.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wickstrom v. Ebert
Kostka v. Hogg, 560 F.2d 37, 40 (1st Cir.1977); see also Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 322 , 95 S.Ct. 992, 1001 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 , rehearing denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1589 , 43 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975) (compensatory damages under § 1983 appropriate only if defendant acted with such impermissible motivation or disregard for established rights that action “cannot reasonably be characterized as being in good faith”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John R. Loveless, Claude W. Bowman & John P. Hall v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Charles G. Dyer, S. T. Belastock and George Smith
See, e.g., U.A.W. v. White Motor Corp., 505 F.2d 1193, 1198-99 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1588 , 43 L.Ed.2d 789 (1975); Ludwig Honold Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Huemmer v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL, ETC.
See, e. g., Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 , 95 S.Ct. 992 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 reh. denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1589 , 43 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975); 11 O’Connor v. Donaldson, 422 U.S. 563 , 95 S.Ct. 2486 , 45 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 456 F.2d 1339 (2d Cir. 1972) (on remand from Bivens, supra, 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Lally
See e. g., Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308, 322 , 95 S.Ct. 992 , 43 L.Ed.2d 214 , reh. denied, 421 U.S. 921 , 95 S.Ct. 1589 , 43 L.Ed.2d 790 (1975); Little v. Walker, 552 F.2d 193, 196 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 932 , 98 S.Ct. 1507 , 55 L.Ed.2d 530 (1978); Knell v. Bensinger, 522 F.2d 720, 724-25 (7th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bernard v. First National Bank of Oregon
See, e.g., American Timber & Trading Co. v. First Nat’l Bank, 511 F2d 980 (9th Cir 1974), cert. denied, 421 US 921 , 95 S Ct 1588 , 43 L Ed 2d 789 (1975); Perlman v. First National Bank of Chicago, 15 Ill App 3d 784, 305 NE2d 236 (1973); Holisak v. Northwestern Nat’l Bank of St.
First National Bank of Oregon
v.
American Timber & Trading Co.
v.
American Timber & Trading Co.
No. 74-1073.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Apr 14, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (2) · Oregon Supreme Court (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of American Bankers Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.