green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sebastian
See United States v. Ives, 504 F.2d 935, 953 (9th Cir. 1974), vacated on other grounds, 421 U.S. 944 , 95 S. Ct. 1671 , 44 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Gary Van Pilon v. Amos Reed
See United States v. Ives, 504 F.2d 935, 939-40 (9th Cir.1974) (declining to decide the question), vacated on other grounds, 421 U.S. 944 , 95 S.Ct. 1671 , 44 L.Ed.2d 97 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Simmons
See United States v Ives, 504 F2d 935 (CA 9, 1974), vacated on other grounds 421 US 944 [ 95 S Ct 1671 ; 44 L Ed 2d 97 ] (1975); People v Mosqueda, 5 Cal App 3d 540; 85 Cal Rptr 346 (1970); State v McKinney, 221 Kan 691; 561 P2d 432 (1977); State v Hutchinson, 458 SW2d 553 (Mo, 1970); State v Albright, 96 Wis 2d 122 ; 291 NW2d 487 , cert den 449 US 957 [ 101 S Ct 367 ; 66 L Ed 2d 223 ] (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Curtis
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Ives, 504 F.2d 935 (9th Cir. 1974), vacated on other grounds, 421 U.S. 944 , 95 S.Ct. 1671 , 44 L.Ed.2d 97 (1975); People v. Mosqueda, 5 Cal.App.3d 540 , 85 Cal.Rptr. 346 (1970); State v. McKinney, 221 Kan. 691 , 561 P.2d 432 (1977); State v. Hutchinson, 458 S.W.2d 553 (Mo.1970); State v. Albright, 96 Wis.2d 122 , 291 N.W.2d 487 , cert. denied, 449 U.S. 957 , 101 S.Ct. 367 , 66 L.Ed.2d 223 .(1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Alfred Goodman
See United States v. Ives, 504 F.2d 935, 946-47 (9th Cir. 1974), vacated and remanded, 421 U.S. 944 , 95 S.Ct. 1671 , 44 L.Ed.2d 97 (1975), rev’d, 574 F.2d 1002 (9th Cir. 1978); Whalem v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 331 , 346 F.2d 812 (1965); Hunter v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 323 , 323 F.2d 625 (1963), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 918 , 85 S.Ct. 912 , 13 L.Ed.2d 803 (1965); Amador Beltran v. United States, 302 F.2d 48, 50 (1st Cir. 1962); Hereden v. United States, 286 F.2d 526 (10th Cir. 1961); D.C.Code § 24-301(b).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Knox
See U.S. v. Ives, 504 F.2d 935 (9th Cir. 1974), vacated 421 U.S. 944 , 95 S. Ct. 1671 , 44 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Wilcox v. Johnson
See U.S. v. Ives, 504 F.2d 935 (9th Cir. 1974), vacated 421 U.S. 944 , 95 S.Ct. 1671 , 44 L.Ed.2d 97 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See U. S. v. Ives, 504 F.2d 935 (9th Cir. 1974), vacated 421 U.S. 944 , 95 S.Ct. 1671 , 44 L.Ed.2d 97 (1975). 10 A number of cases have specifically held that a criminal defendant has no constitutional right to testify in his own behalf.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Eddie Lee Anthony
(5×)
See, e.g., United States v. Ives, 504 F.2d 935, 941 (9th Cir. 1974), vacated on other grounds, 421 U.S. 944 (1975), opinion reinstated in relevant part, 547 F.2d 1100 (9th Cir. 1976) (holding that a defendant may forfeit the privilege to testify through conduct); Douglas v. State, 214 P.3d 312, 322 (Alaska 2009) (applying the Allen standards to determine whether the defendant forfeited his right to testify in person through misconduct); State v. Chappie, 36 P.3d 1025, 1033-34 (Wash. 2001) (relying on Allen and Ives to determine whether the defendant lost his right to testify by way of his cond…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Owen Duane Nunnemaker v. Eddie S. Ylst, Warden
See e.g., United States v. Ives, 504 F.2d 935 (9th Cir.1974), vascated on other grounds, 421 U.S. 944 (1975); Schantz v. Eyman, 418 F.2d 11 (9th Cir.1969); United States v. Trapnell, 495 F.2d 22 (2d Cir.1974); United States v. Day, 1 M.J. 1167 (C.G.C.M.R.1975); United States v. White, 41 C.M.R. 338 (C.M.A.1970); United States v. Wilson, 40 C.M.R. 112 (C.M.A.1969); State v. Collins, 236 N.W.2d 376 (Iowa 1975); State v. Wade, 527 P.2d 753 (Or.Ct.App.1974); Stultz v. State, 500 S.W.2d 853 (Tex.Ct.App.1973); State v. Davis, 514 P.2d 149 (Wash.1973); State v. Anderson, 509 P.2d 80 (Wash.Ct.App.1973…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harvey R. Johnson
See 18 U.S.C. § 3481 (1982) (authorizing accused to testify at his own request) (emphasis added); United States v. Systems Architects, Inc., 757 F.2d 373, 375-76 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 139 , 88 L.Ed.2d 115 (1985); see also United States v. Ives, 504 F.2d 935, 941 (9th Cir.1974) (holding that defendant can waive right to testify through contumacious conduct), vacated, 421 U.S. 944 , 95 S.Ct. 1671 , 44 L.Ed.2d 97 (1975); reinstated in relevant part and vacated in part, 547 F.2d 1100 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1103 , 97 S.Ct. 1130 , 51 L.Ed.2d 554 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Mandujano
v.
Mandujano
No. 74-754.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Apr 28, 1975.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 420 U. S. 989.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted. It is ordered that Michael Allen Peters, Esquire, of Houston, Tex., be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.