green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Pierre Michel Henri Giry and Steven Seward
it is well established that a statute increasing a penalty with respect to a criminal conspiracy which commenced prior to, but was continued beyond the effective date of the statute, is not ex post facto as to that crime.
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bulmaro TORRES-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Hickman, 523 F.2d 323, 327 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 778 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976)(purpose of investigatory stop is to allow officer to confirm or dispel suspicions through reasonable questions); United States v. Head, 783 F.2d 1422, 1425 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1171 , 106 S.Ct. 2895 , 90 L.Ed.2d 982 (1986)(officer can continue to detain a defendant during investigatory stop when his suspicion is heightened, in order to deny or confirm suspicions).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael L. Montalvo
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 365 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert H. Hopkins, Jr. Thomas A. Oliver Robert C. Bonner William A. Lane Blynn L. Shideler
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 360 (9th Cir.1975) ("Evidence as to acts occurring prior to [the effective date] in support of the conspiracy charges was clearly proper as a matter of evidentiary law."), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Tharp
(2×)
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 364-65 (9th Cir.1975) (and cases cited), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 [ 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 ] (1976); United States v. Baresh, 790 F.2d 392, 404 (5th Cir.1986); United States v. Todd, 735 F.2d 146, 150 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1189 [ 105 S.Ct. 957 , 83 L.Ed.2d 964 ] (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,487 Charles Vickers v. Chiles Drilling Co. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.
See Hicks v. Ocean Drilling and Exploration Co., 512 F.2d 817, 824 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976); Marathon Pipeline Co. v. Drilling Rig Rowan/Odessa, 761 F.2d 229, 223 (5th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert W. Kouba, A/K/A Rusty Kouba
See United States v. Pohlman, 522 F.2d 974 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1049 , 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Wilcox v. Ho-Wing Sit
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
J. D. Watkins v. Pentzien, Inc.
Accord, Hicks v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co., 512 F.2d 817, 823 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976); Perfect v. American Commercial Barge Lines, 509 F.Supp. 734, 736 (E.D.La.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,982, 7 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1357 United States of America v. Rodney H. Burreson, Ronald L. Laraneta, Thomas L. Channell, Defendants
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 359 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976). 25 There was no abuse of discretion here.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Burreson
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 359 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Glenn Moore, United States of America v. Michael English
(2×)
See United States v. Hickman, 523 F.2d 323, 326-27 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 778 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976)
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zemek
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zemek
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied. 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dwight Armstrong
United States v. Brashier, 548 F.2d 1315, 1323 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1111 , 97 S.Ct. 1149 , 51 L.Ed.2d 565 (1977); see United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 359 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976); United States v. Thomas, 453 F.2d 141 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1069 , 92 S.Ct. 1516 , 31 L.Ed.2d 801 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
27 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) 80,367, 6 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 696 United States of America v. Ottavio F. Grande, United States of America v. Gerald W. Berg, A/K/A Buzz Berg, United States of America v. Andrew Hawthorne, United States of America v. Edgar Hawthorne, United States of America v. Pietro Castagna, A/K/A Peter Castagna
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 363 (8 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Grande
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 363 (8 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chovanec
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 364 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Ojala
See United States v. Pohlman, 522 F.2d 974 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1049 , 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976); United States v. Dowell, 446 F.2d 145 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 984 , 92 S.Ct. 448 , 30 L.Ed.2d 368 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nathaniel Samuels v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Southport Stevedores, Inc., Third-Party Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin, a Corporation, Intervenor
We adhere to the logic of the Ninth Circuit. 19 In reaching our own conclusion, we start with the premise that, under the Act, the employer is immune to suit for indemnity or contribution by the vessel. 33 U.S.C. § 905 ; see White v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., 5 Cir. 1975, 512 F.2d 486 , cert. denied sub nom., 1976, 423 U.S. 1049 , 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 ; Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Service Contracting, Inc., 5 Cir. 1973, 490 F.2d 299 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuels v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas
In reaching our own conclusion, we start with the premise that, under the Act, the employer is immune to suit for indemnity or contribution by the vessel. 33 U.S.C. § 905 ; see White v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., 5 Cir. 1975, 512 F.2d 486 , cert. denied sub nom., 1976, 423 U.S. 1049 , 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 ; Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Service Contracting, Inc., 5 Cir. 1973, 490 F.2d 299 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Sanders, III
See United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976); United States v. Franks, 511 F.2d 25 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1042 , 95 S.Ct. 2654 , 45 L.Ed.2d 693 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlota Castaneda De Esper v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Aguilera-Enriquez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 516 F.2d 565, 568 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , *82 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed. 688 (1976); United States v. Lehmann, 239 F.2d 663, 666 (6th Cir. 1956).
cited
Cited "see"
Avila Group, Inc. v. Norma J. of California
See Hicks v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co., 512 F.2d 817, 825-26 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976); National Steel Corp. v. L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Longview Refining Co. v. Shore
See United States v. Pohlman, 522 F.2d 974, 976 (8 Cir. 1975) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1049 , 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976); United States v. McCorkle, 511 F.2d 482, 484 (7 Cir. 1975) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 826 , 96 S.Ct. 43 , 46 L.Ed.2d 43 (1975); United States v. Greenlee, 517 F.2d 899, 904 (3 Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 985 , 96 S.Ct. 391 , 46 L.Ed.2d 301 (1975); United States v. Hawk, 497 F.2d 365, 366-367 (9 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 838 , 95 S.Ct. 67 , 42 L.Ed.2d 65 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William R. Ojala
Id.; see United States v. Pohlman, 522 F.2d 974, 977 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1049 , 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gilbert H. Paulton
See United States v. Pohlman, 522 F.2d 974, 978 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1049 , 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976)7 and cases cited.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of New York v. Lead Industries Ass'n
Assn., 222 AD2d, at 124 ; see also, United States v Boyd, 520 F2d 642 [6th Cir 1975], cert denied 423 US 1050 [holding restitution claims accrue when money is spent].) The Court clarified its holding in 888 (supra) and distinguished it from this case: “While we adhere to our holding in [888] because no true indemnity or restitution claim was there pleaded, to the extent that the unfortunate choice of obscure language in the decision, unnecessary to the result, appears to posit the affirmance of the dismissal of the indemnity and restitution causes of action in terms of time-barred third-part…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
L-S
See Matter of Gabryelsky, 20 I&N Dec. 750, 751-52 (BIA 1993); see also Aguilera-Enriquez v. INS, 516 F.2d 565, 571 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Fletcher
(2×)
See also United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Congregation Beth Yitzhok v. Briskman
See, e.g., United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352, 363-64 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976); Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc. v. Patsy Noto and Jopat Auto Center, Inc., 548 F.Supp. 352 (E.D.N.Y.1982); Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. O’Hearn, 523 F.Supp. 244, 247-248 (S.D.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Allied Chemical Corp.
See, e. g., Hicks v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co., 512 F.2d 817, 825-26 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976), quoting St.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Allied Chemical Corporation
See, e. g., Hicks v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co., 512 F.2d 817, 825-26 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976), quoting St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Barge Shamrock
(2×)
See also United States v. Boyd, 520 F.2d 642, 645 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jones
The court, concluding that the defendant remained in constructive possession of the records, emphasized that even if the corporation complied with the subpoena the most it could do would be to deliver the safe to the courtroom-the defendant would still be compelled to deliver up his own personal papers since only he and his co-defendant knew the combination. 272 F.2d at 346 ; see also In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 520 F.2d 904 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 (1976). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jones
The court, concluding that the defendant remained in constructive possession of the records, emphasized that even if the corporation complied with the subpoena-the most it could do would be to deliver the safe to the courtroom-the defendant would still be compelled to deliver up his own personal papers since only he and his co-defendant knew the combination. 272 F.2d at 346 ; see also In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 520 F.2d 904 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 (1976). 9 Jones testified he told Agent Williams that he realized the Hortons' records were not "formal, good and adequate r…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Kaye
See also United States v. Campanale, 518 F.2d 352 , 363 n. 32 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 777 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Shaheen Rehman v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(4×)
See also Aguilera-Enriquez v. INS, 516 F.2d 565, 570 (6th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 776 , 46 L.Ed.2d 638 (1976); Will v. INS, 447 F.2d 529, 531 (7th Cir. 1971). 3 As the court in Cruz-Martinez v. INS, supra, 404 F.2d at 1200 , stated: Deportation is a function of federal and not of state law.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aguilera-Enriquez
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 75-488.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.