green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Golding v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cameron v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 725-26 (concluding Navy could rightly find plaintiffs absence was not unavoidable even though Mexican detention for drug trafficking may have been based upon a confession extracted by torture), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
LTV Steel Co. v. Shalala
See Gentry v. United States, 546 F.2d 343, 355 (Cl.Ct.1976) (“Our authority to issue a declaratory judgment is limited_ We are authorized to do so only where ‘it is tied and subordinate to a monetary award.’ ”) (quoting Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975)); Kennedy v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 69, 75 (Cl.Ct.1989) (dismissal is required where the relief sought is other than monetary compensation).
cited
Cited "see"
Martinez v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Sargent v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jagnandan v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 724 (court lacks jurisdiction to entertain claim for pay and allowances beyond term of enlistment), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wales v. United States
See Clackum v. United States, 148 Ct.Cl. 404 , 296 F.2d 226 (1960) (discharge invalid due to gross procedural and constitutional defect, but relief limited to end of then-current enlistment), explained in Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723-24 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Farms v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Opalack v. United States
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States Steel Corp. v. United Mine Workers
See Buffalo Forge Co. v. United Steelworkers of America, 2 Cir. 1975, 517 F.2d 1207 , cert. granted, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 214 , 46 L.Ed.2d 139 (Oct. 20, 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Barnum
See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 719 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 (1975); and Jankovic v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 807 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Flowers v. United States
Unless a statute or regulation confers upon a serviceperson the right to reenlist, “an enlisted man has no right to reenlist when his previous enlistment period ends____” McEniry v. United States, 7 Cl.Ct. 622, 626 (1985) (citing Thompson v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 983, 983-84 , 1979 WL 10425 (1979)); see also Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , 1975 WL 22844 (1975) (stating that the United States Court of Claims has “consistently held that since ... servicemen have no right to reenlist at the expiration of their current enlistments, the United States has undertaken to pay t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bates v. United States
Voge v. United States, 844 F.2d 776, 781 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 941 , 109 S.Ct. 365 , 102 L.Ed.2d 355 (1988); see also Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975) (no power to grant affirmative non-monetary relief in military pay case unless it is tied and subordinate to a monetary award)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Griffin v. United States
United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 397-98 , 96 S.Ct. 948, 952-53 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976); see United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 3-4 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969); see also Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amoco Production Company v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of Department of the Interior, Defendants
See, e.g., Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 (declaratory judgments that are "tied and subordinate to a monetary award"), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 140 (1975); 28 U.S.C. § 1507 (actions under § 7428 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 289, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,378 Ag 1 Dennis R. Beller v. The Honorable J. William Middendorf, Secretary of the Navy,defendants-Appellees. James Lee Miller v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, Mary Roseann Saal v. J. William Middendorf, Secretary of the United States Navy, in His Officialcapacity
See, e. g., Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 274 (1975); Neal v. Secretary of the Navy, supra, 472 F.Supp. at 781-85 ; Knehans v. Alexander, 566 F.2d 312, 314 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 995 , 98 S.Ct. 1646 , 56 L.Ed.2d 83 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beller v. Middendorf
See, e. g., Austin v. United States, 206 Ct.Cl. 719, 723 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 , 96 S.Ct. 215 , 46 L.Ed.2d 274 (1975); Neal v. Secretary of the Navy, supra, 472 F.Supp. at 781-85 ; Knehans v. Alexander, 566 F.2d 312, 314 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 995 , 98 S.Ct. 1646 , 56 L.Ed.2d 83 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Novick
v.
United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
v.
United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
No. 75-300.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 1975.
Published
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition denied.