green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.0 score
G Cite
cited 9× by 7 distinct cases ·
"Brady clearly does not impose an affirmative duty upon the government to take action to discover information which it does not possess."
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“acts which the state knows about”
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Campbell v. State
brady clearly does not impose an affirmative duty upon the government to take action to discover information which it does not possess
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lewis v. United States
brady clearly does not impose an affirmative duty upon the government to take action to discover information which it does not possess.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Clinton Etheridge
(2×)
See U.S. v. Goodie, 524 F.2d 515 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905 , 96 S.Ct. 1497 , 47 L.Ed.2d 755 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Huey P. Newton v. Superior Court of California, in and for the County of Alameda
United States v. Locke, 542 F.2d 800, 801 (9th Cir.1976); see United States v. Goodie, 524 F.2d 515, 518 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905, 96 S.Ct. 1497 , 47 L.Ed.2d 755 (1976); United States v. Thomas, 484 F.2d 909, 914-15 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 924 , 94 S.Ct. 1428 , 39 L.Ed.2d 480 (1974); United States v. Oliver, 683 F.2d 224, 228 (7th Cir.1982); United States v. Johnson, 683 F.2d 1187, 1189 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Shomo, 786 F.2d 981, 985 (10th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Driver
See United States v. Beaver, 524 F.2d 963, 966 (5th Cir.1975) (“Brady clearly does not impose an affirmative duty upon the government to discover information which it does not possess.”), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905 , 96 S.Ct. 1498 , 47 L.Ed.2d 756 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Emilio Bruscantini
See U.S. v. Goodie, 524 F.2d 515 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905 , 96 S.Ct. 1497 , 47 L.Ed.2d 755 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lackey v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Crim, 527 F.2d 289 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 425 U.S. 905 , 96 S.Ct. 1497 , 47 L.Ed.2d 755 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Eugene Price and James Terrence Price
See United States v. Crim, 527 F.2d 289 (10th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905 , 96 S.Ct. 1497 , 47 L.Ed.2d 755 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Fielding
See United States v. Rose, 526 F.2d 745 , 748 n.3 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905 (1976). 26 See the importance attached to the question of the bona tides of the police, and the discussion of deterrence of official misbehavior, in the concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Powell in the Brown case, 422 U.S. at 606, 610-612 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Erickson
See also U.S. v. Callahan, 300 F.Supp. 519, 525 (S.D.N.Y.1969). " Brady clearly does not impose an affirmative duty upon the government to take action to discover information which it does not possess." U.S. v. Beaver, 524 F.2d 963, 966 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905 , 96 S.Ct. 1498 , 47 L.Ed.2d 756 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. N. John Fontana, II
(2×)
See also United States v. Crim, 527 F.2d 289 (10 Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard A. Schmitt
See also United States v. Goodie, 524 F.2d 515, 518 (5th Cir.1975) (“only knowledge of defendant that is a necessary element of the receiving crime [§ 1202(a) ] is that he knowingly received a firearm"), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905 , 96 S.Ct. 1497 , 47 L.Ed.2d 755 (1976); United States v. Ruisi, 460 F.2d 153, 156-57 (2d Cir.) (scienter as a requirement of § 922(a)(1) will not be presumed since statute regulates dangerous objects and activities), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 914 , 93 S.Ct. 234 , 34 L.Ed.2d 176 (1972). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raul Luis-Gonzalez, Leonardo Espinosa, Oswaldo Carbonell, Marcelian Torres-Gomez, Jr.
“While Brady requires the government to tender to the defense all exculpatory evidence in its possession, it establishes no obligation on the government to seek out such evidence.” United States v. Walker, 559 F.2d 365, 373 (5th Cir.1977); see also United States v. Beaver, 524 F.2d 963, 966 (5th Cir.1975) (“But Brady clearly does not impose an affirmative duty upon the government to take action to discover information which it does not possess.”), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 905 , 96 S.Ct. 1498 , 47 L.Ed.2d 756 (1976); accord United States v. Atkinson, 512 F.2d 1235, 1239 (4th Cir.1975) (go…
Gary
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 75-5700.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 1976.
Ct. Crim. App, Tex. Certiorari denied.