Ingram v. Georgia, 425 U.S. 908 (1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Ingram v. Georgia, 425 U.S. 908 (1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Curtis v. School Committee (mass, 1995-07-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Curtis v. School Committee
Mass. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Citizens for Parental Rights v. San Mateo County Bd. of Educ., 51 Cal. App. 3d 1, 30-31 (1975), appeal dismissed, 425 U.S. 908 (1976); Medeiros v. Kiyosaki, 52 Haw. 436, 438-439 (1970). 9 The plaintiffs argue that the condom-availability program is coercive because, although participation is voluntary, the program has been implemented in the compulsory setting of the public schools.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING
Ariz. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Church, 24 Ariz.App. 287, 301 , 537 P.2d 1345, 1359 (1975) (concluding that employer could be liable for employee's defamatory statements made within scope of employment pursuant to "well-settled principles of agency law"), appeal dismissed, 425 U.S. 908 , 96 S.Ct. 1502 , 47 L.Ed.2d 759 , reh'g denied, 425 U.S. 985 , 96 S.Ct. 2193 , 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ingram
v.
Georgia International Brotherhood or Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Eazor Express, Inc. Cozzetti v. Central Telephone Co.
No. 75-862; No. 75-930; No. 75-5975.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 1976.
425 U.S. 908
Published

424 U. S. 914;

424 U. S. 935; and

424 U. S. 925. Petitions for rehearing denied.